From: johnturmel@gmail.com   
      
   JCT: Wendy Wright told Justice Brown that the problem of   
   short-changed permits has been mooted by the recent   
   emergency S.56 Class Exemptions. But it really only stopped   
   the rip-off of future patients, it did not fix the rip-off   
   of past patients.   
      
   One of the people whom she says has had his early expiry   
   solved is Kent Truman. And yet, his permit is expiring today   
   with no documentation to show a cop that it's still good.   
      
   When I heard that the Cause of Action B claimed by our   
   Plaintiffs had been mooted, I naturally concluded that they   
   had extended everyone's permits to the full term. How else   
   could the claims of people asking for their full terms be   
   mooted but by getting their full terms. And so I published   
   my article: Biggest MedPot S.56 90,000 Class Exemption   
   covered up article and video https://youtu.be/vB4aqjEyaQM   
      
   It was only after Wendy filed the Crown Motion to dismiss   
   that I realized that she was stating that stopping the   
   future rip-off was enough to settle the past rip-offs, which   
   it does not, that I published my "PDF for ACMPR growers &   
   garden supply shops" where I mentioned that fixing it for   
   people post-March 2 wasn't helping our victims pre-March 2   
   on May 5.   
      
   So here's Kent happily presuming that his permit has been   
   extended and he even called Health Canada who told him the   
   same. Lucky they record and document all calls.   
      
   But playing safe, he still sent in his renewal a month ago   
   to ensure he'd have the paperwork regardless. Now, it's not   
   the 6-8 weeks they recommend but it is double the 4 weeks it   
   used to take under the MMAR. After all, what's to do in   
   renewing an existing application. Shall they check the same   
   doctor's credentials again? Shall they check whether the   
   same site is adjacent to any schools again?   
      
   And then on May 5, he hears again from me that the S.56   
   Order has not extended his permit and he's expiring in 3   
   days! So I get a frantic call about what to do and organize   
   a motion for his last day asking Judge Brown to save him.   
      
   In another case, I forget which, Justice Brown ordered   
   Health Canada to file a response by noon with a hearing   
   later that afternoon. I really expected him to do the same   
   here. He did not. He let the permit expire presuming Wendy's   
   right.   
      
   Kent got an email from the Court:   
       The Court, (the Honourable Mr. Justice Brown) has, on   
       May 8th, 2018, issued the following direction:   
      
            "The motion is removed from the list of cases to be   
            heard on May 8 2018. The Defendant is to file   
            responding material by May 16 2018. The Plaintiff   
            is to file reply on or before May 23 2018."   
      
       I trust that this is satisfactory to you.   
       Yours truly,   
       Jessie McDonald, Registry Officer   
      
   JCT: Guess we'll find out if it's satisfactory if we find   
   out Wendy wasn't lawying when she said his problem was   
   solved and if he doesn't get busted in the meantime. Doesn't   
   Health Canada inform the cops the moment someone's exemption   
   is no longer valid? (I don't think so but a cop with a   
   grudge can call and find out just by asking.)   
      
   Given Health Canada had told Kent he remained protected, and   
   given Wendy told Justice Brown that the claims of short-   
   changed permit holders had been mooted, I guess Judge Brown   
   chose to believe that the permit wasn't expiring today.   
   There is always the chance I'm wrong. Har har har har har   
   har.   
      
   So I'd bet they'll get his renewal to him before May 16 so   
   they can include that his motion is mooted in their   
   Response, like they've done so many times before. While   
   asking him to abandon his motion as mooted.   
      
   But we're going to make her file the Response telling the   
   Court it is mooted by delivery of his permit before May 16   
   but also why Health Canada told him he remained protected   
   and why she told the court that he remained protected if he   
   really is not. Can't wait to read that response.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)