From: johnturmel@gmail.com   
      
   TURMEL: Art Jackes signature rejection claim dismissed   
      
   JCT: JCT: Art Jackes had his original signatures rejected as not   
   originals by Health Canada. He immediately sent it back   
   pointing out the signatures were original. They said not again   
   and he filed a Statement of Claim:   
      
   Art Jackes Federal Court claim for rejections   
   https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.fan.john-turmel/mzks_P3fkVw   
      
   1. The Plaintiff seeks a declaration that delaying his   
   application to amend Plaintiff's ACMPR permit Number MCR:   
   16335 for over 13 weeks by rejecting the originality of   
   signatures in black ink and suggesting a new application be   
   signed in blue ink when Licensed Producer Security Clearance   
   Applicants are prohibited from using blue ink is an   
   unconstitutional violation of the patient's S.7 Right to   
   Life.   
      
   JCT: He also filed a motion for interim remedy   
      
                          NOTICE OF MOTION   
   TAKE NOTICE THAT on Tues Nov 7 2017, at 9:30am, the   
   Applicant will make a motion to the Court General Sittings on   
   short notice if necessary at the Federal Courthouse in   
   Toronto.   
      
   THE MOTION IS FOR an Order granting Applicant interim relief:   
   1) a personal constitutional exemption to continue growing   
   marijuana pursuant to the amended conditions for the ACMPR   
   permit MCR-16355 until processing of the second application in   
   blue ink by the Health Canada is complete; or, alternatively,   
   2) an amendment of Applicant's Exemption.   
      
   THE GROUNDS FOR THE MOTION ARE that insisting Applicants for   
   Security Clearances sign in black ink while rejecting the   
   originality of Plaintiff's original signatures in black ink   
   and demanding a new application signed in blue ink is an   
   arbitrary and irrational violation of Plaintiff's S.7 Charter   
   Right to Life.   
      
                     AFFIDAVIT OF ARTHUR JACKES   
      
   1. Ex. A is a copy of the Application to Amend Plaintiff's   
   ACMPR permit MCR-16355 which was twice rejected.   
      
   2. Ex. B dated Aug 22, 2017 is the Health Canada response   
   rejecting my application for want of original signatures.   
      
   3. Ex. C dated Aug 22 2017 is my letter explaining I knew   
   all pages had to be original with a note beside each   
   signature indicating it was original.   
      
   4. Ex. D dated Oct 19, 2017 is the Health Canada response   
   again rejecting my application with a letter stating:   
       Health Canada received and screened your application   
       package to register for personal use or designated   
       production under the Access to Cannabis for Medical   
       Purposes Regulations (ACMPR). Your application package   
       was found to be incomplete in the areas identified in   
       the list below. We are returning, with this letter, your   
       registration form and all supporting documents you   
       provided with your form:   
      
       Section 3 Responsible Person - Signature must be   
       originalAnnex A   
       Section A2: Production Site Owner's Consent - Signature   
       must be original   
       Comments:   
       All the documents you submitted to Health Canada were   
       returned with this letter and no physical record was   
       kept by Health Canada. Should you wish to register, you   
       will need to submit a revised registration form and the   
       required supporting documents.   
      
       Section 2 Application Information   
       The registration form you submitted does not cover all   
       the information required under the ACMPR.   
       Additional Comments:   
       As discussed by phone on October 19 and 20, the   
       application that has been submitted is inadmissible as   
       the signatures in Section 3 and Section 2 have been   
       deemed to not be original. Applicant has been informed   
       that submission of a new application would result in the   
       application being treated at a higher priority.   
       Applicant was informed that, while not mandatory, it is   
       our recommendation he use a blue ball-point pen when   
       filling out the application to minimize disagreement as   
       to the veracity of the signatures. As acknowledgment of   
       the expense of postage, a pre-paid envelope has been   
       attached to be used for submission of the medical   
       document and newly-filled application form.   
      
   5. Ex. E is from the Health Canada web page "Instructions   
   for Completion of Security Clearance Form Under the Access   
   to Cannabis for Medical Purposes Regulations (ACMPR) which   
   makes it mandatory not to use blue ink:   
       1.2 This form is to be completed using an automated   
       system or printed in block letter format in black ink.   
      
   6. Ex. F is a post by Jeff Harris stating on Oct 26 at   
   12:17PM   
       My application and Colleen's were done in black ink. I   
       think they're being difficult on purpose   
      
   7.  I am presently getting my next application signed in   
   blue ink and retain the original of the first application   
   for forensic verification if necessary.   
      
                      WRITTEN REPRESENTATIONS   
      
   1. Health Canada twice deemed Original signatures with ball-   
   point pens were deemed not to be original by Health Canada.   
      
   2. Health Canada could have scratched the back of the page   
   with a pencil to see the indentations of the signatures made   
   by ball-point pens.   
      
   3. Health Canada prescribed signing with blue ink to allay   
   their conclusions of non-originality.   
      
   4. Yet, for Security Clearances, signatures in black are   
   mandated! Not blue.   
      
   5. A forensic examination of the application could determine   
   if Health Canada's reasons for rejecting the originality of   
   the signatures were valid but no reasons were given.   
      
   JCT: When the Crown found out he had signed his next   
   application in blue ink, they hopped-to-it to get him his   
   permit and mooten the hearing of the motion.   
      
   Art Jackes' MedPot Exemption processed in 2 days   
   https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.fan.john-turmel/cnLBEIOfLQI   
      
   But they had a motion to strike his action over the 13-week   
   delay and Judge Brown just handed down his order.   
      
   Federal Court   
   Ottawa, Ontario, August 28 2018   
      
   T-1654-17   
      
   PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Brown   
      
   BETWEEN   
      
                          ARTHUR JACKES   
                                                     Plaintiff   
                               and   
                      HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN   
                                                     Defendant   
      
                             JUDGMENT   
      
   UPON motion by counsel for the Defendant in writing pursuant   
   to the provisions of Rule 369 for an order striking the   
   proceedings without leave to amend, with costs and such   
   further and other relief as may seem just;   
      
   AND UPON reading the pleadings and proceedings herein   
   including the memorandum of argument filed by the Defendant   
   and written correspondence received from the Plaintiff;   
      
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)