Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    can.legal    |    Debating Canuck legal system quirks    |    10,932 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 10,478 of 10,932    |
|    John KingofthePaupers Turmel to All    |
|    TURMEL: Tim McConnell Pot Charges withdr    |
|    11 Oct 18 10:50:38    |
      From: johnturmel@gmail.com              TURMEL: Tim McConnell Pot Charges withdrawn, Discharge on rifle              JCT: Tim McConnell had rented out the family homestead to be       used by a DG for two patients whose MMAR permits had been       extended by Allard. But after a while with no respite, the       DG was burned out. Remember that one of our constitutional       torts was that no help was allowed to the patient or the DG.       But Judge Manson had not allowed any changes to an MMAR       permit, if the DG dies or leaves, the patient is screwed.              Tim had his own legal garden and offered to help the DG do       the work so the patients would not lose their permits.              Then he got busted tending the garden and charged with       Production and Possession for the Purpose of Trafficking.              He had originally had Michel Swanston, the same lawyer as       Luc Paquette and a bunch from the Projet Nouage conspiracy       bust who got them to pleaded guilty for big money. Luc       dropped him and ended up with a discharge and no criminal       record for free. Har har har              So Tim filed my Quash Motion which got put off to the trial       judge below. He filed 3 extraordinary motions in Superior       Court, pretty unique, to have his election to Superior Court       for jury trial and a judge granted his motion.              So then the Crown withdrew the Production charge to take       away his right to a jury trial and stayed below with only       the Possession for the Purpose of Trafficking Charge.              I really thought that could be beaten. How could he be       trafficking when the pot was destined for the DG to be sent       to the patients? Tim would have had to steal their pot to       traffick it to someone else, right? So they should have       charged him with illegally possessing the pot but not for       the purpose of trafficking when it was for the purpose of       helping the lawful Designated Grower!              Then Tim filed the new "Mernagh Plus Why" Charter motion on       the Gatineau and Montreal Crown Attorneys offices. With       testimony that doctors were refusing for non-medical       reasons, we also had a representative from a Montreal       referral clinic who was going to testify that they had       helped over 10,000 patients get permits when their Quebec       doctors refused to participate!              But Tuesday morning Oct 9 of his trial, a new male Crown       asked to speak to Tim and said he had an offer he doubted       Tim could refuse. He was right.              Withdrawal of the pot charge if he pleaded guilty to unsafe       storage of his dad's rifle and would recommend a discharge       on that if he made a $500 contribution to charity. So no       Criminal Record. An offer he could not refuse.              So instead of possibly time in jail if Swanston had pleaded       him guilty, his putting up a fight left him with no criminal       record. The second of Swanston's clients I got off that he       would not have gotten off. Har har har har har har.              So Tim's a happy camper and the DG may even be willing to       start up for the patients again after a couple of years of       rest. The only people harmed were the patients.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca