From: johnturmel@gmail.com   
      
   TURMEL: More time for Crown on motion for 10-day supply?   
      
   JCT: The Crown has asked the judge to file their Motion   
   Response on Jan 7 next year. They really don't need that   
   much time so Jeff wrote:   
      
   Allan Harris, Lead Plaintiff   
      
   Nov 23 2018   
      
   VIA E-FILING   
      
   Senior Registry Officer   
   Courts Administration Service   
   Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0H9   
      
   Dear Registrar   
      
   Please accept this letter as a Reply to the Defendant's   
   letter of November 20 2018:   
      
   The Defendant asks the court to respond to the Plaintiff's   
   fresh motion for interim relief by Jan 7 2019 stating:   
       Canada understands the Nov 1 Order to mean that the   
       plaintiff's motion for interim relief will not proceed   
       until after Canada's motion to strike, which has the   
       potential to render the plaintiff's motion moot...   
       Canada requests confirmation of this understanding.   
       If the Court is instead of the view that the plaintiff's   
       motion should proceed at this stage... Canada proposes   
       that it proceed in writing.   
      
   The Plaintiff also submits that a ruling on the motion for   
   interim relief has the same potential to render the   
   plaintiff's motion to strike moot. Plaintiff does not object   
   should the court feel an oral hearing is not necessary and   
   would request a video teleconference as was done in the 2014   
   Gold Stars hearing on April 29 2014 if an oral hearing is   
   ordered.   
      
       Canada also proposes that its response to the motion be   
       due no sooner than Jan 7 2019. Canada is of the view   
       that this will provide it with sufficient time to   
       respond to the plaintiff's motion, while meeting   
       Canada's other deadlines on the motion to strike the   
       present claim..   
      
   Plaintiff notes that the original motion citing the sections   
   in the ACMPR was served on Oct 22, over a month ago. Since   
   the arguments against the sections in the Cannabis   
   Regulations are the same, Plaintiff suggests a timetable   
   filing the Defendant's response in early December and   
   Plaintiff's Reply a week later before the Christmas holidays   
   might be more appropriate.   
      
   After all, it is one simple issue. Should the applicants   
   remain disallowed from possessing a day or two's supply of   
   medication or be allowed a 10-day supply pending the claim   
   to possess the same 30-day supply as smaller dosers? And   
   you've already had 4 weeks.   
   ______________________________   
   Allan J. Harris   
   CC: Wendy.Wright BY EMAIL   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)