From: johnturmel@gmail.com   
      
   TURMEL: Court asked for Quadruple MedPot Appeal Hearing   
      
   JCT: Four Plaintiffs who got separate decisions from Justice   
   Brown filed appeals. I want them all heard together.   
      
   The Crown's last letter mentioned how they wanted Igor   
   Mozajko's similar appeal heard apart in Toronto. His answer:   
      
   IGOR MOZAJKO:   
      
   Monday March 11 2019   
      
   VIA FACSIMILE   
      
   Court Administrator:   
   Federal Court of Appeal   
   180 Queen St. W. #200   
   Toronto, ON, M5V 3L6   
   Fax: 416-973-2154   
      
   RE: Mozajko v. HMTQ No: A-339-18   
      
   In the Requisition for hearing - Appeal in Allan J. Harris   
   v. HMQ A-258-18, the Defendant Canada wrote:   
       In addition to the present appeal, the Court is   
       currently seized of Her Majesty The Queen v. Igor   
       Mozajko, Court File No. A-339-18 (the "Mozajko appeal")   
       which raises similar issues. Canada proposes that these   
       appeals be heard separately as the present appeal is   
       farther advanced and the parties have requested hearings   
       in different cities (Vancouver and Toronto,   
       respectively) owing to the locations of the self-   
       represented plaintiffs. However, Canada wishes to call   
       the Court's attention to the similar issues in the event   
       the Court wishes to consider this in scheduling or   
       assigning a panel to hear these matters.   
       Yours truly, Jon Bricker   
      
   Could you bring it to the court's attention that I am also   
   one of the plaintiffs below for whom Allan J. Harris is Lead   
   Plaintiff and will be arguing issues raised in my appeal.   
      
   Harris and I both seek to overturn dismissal of our claims   
   for restitution of the shorted period of time. Canada seeks   
   to overturn the dismissal of both their motions to strike   
   our delay damages claims. His appeal speaks for all the   
   others including me. My own appeal adds only repetition.   
      
   Because the Harris appeal is more advanced than mine, with   
   an opportunity to be heard, I am prepared to accept the   
   decision handed down on the issues that apply to both of us   
   and would ask that my appeal be heard at the same time as   
   the Harris appeal.   
      
   Assigning a second panel in Toronto to hear arguments he   
   will be raising in Vancouver would be a waste of time and   
   resources.   
      
   I would like to attend by telecommunication.   
   ____________________________   
   Igor Mozajko   
      
      
   KENT TRUMAN   
      
   JCT: There is also the appeal of Kent Truman, so:   
      
   Wilfred Kent Truman   
      
   Monday March 11 2019   
      
   VIA FACSIMILE   
      
   Court Administrator:   
   Federal Court of Appeal   
   180 Queen St. W. #200   
   Toronto, ON, M5V 3L6   
   Fax: 416-973-2154   
      
   Re: Kent Truman v. HMTQ A-176-18   
      
   In the Requisition for hearing - Appeal in Allan J. Harris   
   v. HMQ A-258-18, the Defendant Canada wrote:   
       In addition to the present appeal, the Court is   
       currently seized of Her Majesty The Queen v. Igor   
       Mozajko, Court File No. A-339-18 (the "Mozajko appeal")   
       which raises similar issues. Canada proposes that these   
       appeals be heard separately as the present appeal is   
       farther advanced and the parties have requested hearings   
       in different cities (Vancouver and Toronto,   
       respectively) owing to the locations of the self-   
       represented plaintiffs. However, Canada wishes to call   
       the Court's attention to the similar issues in the event   
       the Court wishes to consider this in scheduling or   
       assigning a panel to hear these matters.   
       Yours truly, Jon Bricker   
      
   Could you bring it to the court's attention that I am also   
   one of the plaintiffs below for whom Allan J. Harris is Lead   
   Plaintiff and he will be arguing issues raised in my appeal.   
      
   My claim is that the Class Exemptions issued on March 2 2018   
   did not mooten my motion for interim remedy. The Harris   
   appeal will argue against the effect of the Class   
   Exemptions.   
      
   Because the Harris appeal is more advanced than mine, with   
   an opportunity to be heard, I am prepared to accept the   
   decision handed down on the issues that apply to Harris's   
   plaintiffs and would ask that my appeal be heard at the same   
   time as the Harris appeal.   
      
   Assigning a second panel in Toronto to hear arguments he   
   will be raising in Vancouver would be a waste of time and   
   resources.   
      
   I would like to attend by telecommunication.   
   Dated at York, Ontario on June 14 2018   
   ___________________________   
   Kent Wilfred Truman   
      
      
   ARTHUR JACKES   
      
   JCT: And finally, Art Jackes has an appeal with all   
   documentation done and asking for a Requisition for Hearing   
   too:   
      
   Arthur Jackes   
      
   Monday March 11 2019   
      
   VIA FACSIMILE   
      
   Court Administrator:   
   Federal Court of Appeal   
   Registries of the Federal Courts   
   180 Queen St. W. #200   
   Toronto, ON, M5V 3L6   
   Fax: 416-973-2154   
      
   RE: Jackes v. HMTQ No: A-294-18   
      
   In the Requisition for hearing - Appeal in Allan J. Harris   
   v. HMQ A-258-18, the Defendant Canada wrote:   
       In addition to the present appeal, the Court is   
       currently seized of Her Majesty The Queen v. Igor   
       Mozajko, Court File No. A-339-18 (the "Mozajko appeal")   
       which raises similar issues. Canada proposes that these   
       appeals be heard separately as the present appeal is   
       farther advanced and the parties have requested hearings   
       in different cities (Vancouver and Toronto,   
       respectively) owing to the locations of the self-   
       represented plaintiffs. However, Canada wishes to call   
       the Court's attention to the similar issues in the event   
       the Court wishes to consider this in scheduling or   
       assigning a panel to hear these matters.   
       Yours truly, Jon Bricker   
      
   Could you bring it to the court's attention that I am also   
   one of the plaintiffs below for whom Allan J. Harris is Lead   
   Plaintiff and will be arguing issues raised in my appeal.   
      
   My claim is for damages due to delay by rejection on a false   
   premises of original signatures. Harris' appeal speaks for   
   others claiming damages from delay due to improper rejection   
   as "not original" signatures and I would like my appeal   
   seeking to get me back with them to be heard with them.   
      
   The Harris appeal is only slightly more advanced than mine   
   though with all our Memoranda having been filed, I am filing   
   my Requisition for Hearing - Appeal too.   
      
   Given Harris will be raising the issues I am raising, I   
   would ask that my appeal be heard at the same time as the   
   Harris appeal.   
      
   Assigning a second panel in Toronto to hear arguments he   
   will be raising in Vancouver would be a waste of time and   
   resources.   
      
   I would like to attend by telecommunication.   
   ____________________________   
   Arthur Jackes   
      
   JCT: Art also tried to file the same Requisition for Hearing   
   that the Crown in Harris just did.   
      
   File No: A-294-18   
   FCC: T-1654-17   
                     FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL   
   BETWEEN:   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)