From: johnturmel@gmail.com   
      
   TURMEL: Crown opposes Truman & Jackes appeals with Harris   
      
   Department of Justice   
   March 15 2019   
   VIA FACSIMILE   
      
   Federal Court of Appeal   
      
   Re: JACKES, Arthur, v. HMTQ No: A-294-18   
      
   CR: I am writing to respond to the appellant's letter and   
   Requisition for Hearing dated March 12 2019.   
      
   JCT: Remember, this is the first time the judge is hearing   
   about Art being at the Hearing Requisition stage with all   
   their Memoranda filed. Ready to go. The clerk refused to   
   file it because it was late but Art faxed his letter in!   
      
   CR: The deadline to file a Requisition for Hearing has   
   passed and the appellant has not brought a motion for an   
   extension of time.   
      
   JCT: But we can! it's easy and almost automatic. But we have   
   already asked the judge to expedite Art to the Harris date so   
   shouldn't need a motion to extend time for requisition of a   
   hearing date.   
      
   CR: The Requisition provided by the Appellant also   
   purports to provide a list of dates when the parties are   
   available to participate in a hearing of this matter. The   
   appellant did not consult me with respect to this and I can   
   advise that it does not accurately reflect my availability.   
      
   Since I was asking to attend on the Harris date, I proffered   
   the same dates out of the Crown's own Requisition for   
   Hearing of the Harris appeal. Those were the dates the Crown   
   said they were available for Harris.   
      
   CR: Canada requests that the appellant's Requisition not be   
   accepted for filing in these circumstances.   
      
   JCT: They don't know it hasn't been filed yet and we hope   
   not to have to.   
      
   CR: Canada also requests that this appeal not be heard   
   together with Allan J. Harris v. HMTQ No: A-258-218 ("Harris   
   appeal"), as proposed by the appellant in  his letter. While   
   the appellant's claim is being collectively case-managed   
   with the Harris claim in Federal Court,   
      
   JCT: No longer. Jackes was separately dismissed, wants to   
   get back in under Lead Plaintiff Harris again.   
      
   CR: the appeals are from distinct decisions of the case-   
   management judge and concern different issues.   
      
   JCT: If Donald Cote's suit for damages due to delay from 4   
   false rejections as non-original signatures over 4 months is   
   not struck, they Art wants back in. Same issue as argued for   
   Donald.   
      
   CR: The appellants have also requested hearings in different   
   cities (Toronto and Vancouver, respectively).   
      
   JCT: Or by teleconference... video-conference if they can.   
      
   CR: Canada submits that the appropriate course in these   
   circumstances is for the appeals to continue separately.   
   However, if the appellant feels that a decision in the   
   Harris appeal would assist the parties or the Court in the   
   present appeal, Canada would consent to an adjournment of   
   the present appeal pending the outcome of the Harris appeal.   
      
   Harris gets Cote's claim to 8 months by false rejection to   
   continue. Jackes wants in with his 3 months too. Now.   
      
   They sent a letter in response to Kent Truman wanting to   
   have his issue handled at the same time Jeff handles it   
   first.   
      
   KENT TRUMAN   
      
   Department of Justice   
   March 15 2019   
   VIA FACSIMILE   
      
   Federal Court of Appeal   
      
   Re: TRUMAN, Kent Wilfred v. HMTQ No: A-176-18   
      
   CR: I am writing to respond to the appellant's letter dated   
   March 11 2019.   
      
   The appellant's letter request that this appeal be heard   
   together with Allan J. Harris v. HMTQ No: A-258-218 ("Harris   
   appeal"). This request is inappropriate. The appellant has   
   taken no steps to advance the present appeal since filing a   
   Notice of Appeal. On Feb 6 2018,(?) the Court accordingly   
   issued a Notice of Status Review. The appellant has not   
   responded to this Notice and the deadline to do so has now   
   passed. In the circumstances, Canada requests that the Court   
   proceed to determine that status review and that the present   
   appeal not be scheduled for hearing at this time.   
      
   JCT: Yes, I didn't pursue Kent's appeal but since the issue   
   of the Class Exemption mooting his and Jeff's remedy or not   
   will be raised by Jeff, so why separately from Jeff?   
      
   CR: If the Court determines on status review that the   
   present appeal should proceed, Canada also requests that it   
   not be heard with the Harris appeal.   
      
   JCT: They want a procedural meeting to get it back on track   
   when we have the chance to get it on the final track with   
   Jeff.   
      
   CR: While the appellant's claim is being collectively case-   
   managed with the Harris claim in Federal Court, the appeals   
   are from distinct decisions of the case-management judge and   
   concern different issues and the appellants have requested   
   hearings in different cities (Toronto and Vancouver,   
   respectively).   
      
   JCT: Doesn't matter that the appeals stem from different   
   decisions, Jeff's appeal concerns the same issue.   
      
   CR: The Harris appeal is also much further advanced and   
   would be unduly delayed if not scheduled until all steps in   
   the present appeal are complete.   
      
   JCT: We're not asking that Harris be delayed until Kent   
   catches up, we're asking that Kent spring forward to have   
   his say on his issue at Jeff's hearing.   
      
   CR: Canada submits that the appropriate course in these   
   circumstances is for the appeals to continue separately.   
   However, if the appellant feels that a decision in the   
   Harris appeal would assist the parties or the Court in the   
   present appeal, Canada would consent to an adjournment of   
   the present appeal pending the outcome of the Harris appeal.   
      
   JCT: That doesn't give the opportunity to influence his   
   outcome.   
      
   Have to prepare some answers.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)