Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    can.legal    |    Debating Canuck legal system quirks    |    10,932 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 10,521 of 10,932    |
|    John KingofthePaupers Turmel to All    |
|    TURMEL: Court orders 4 separate medpot p    |
|    02 Apr 19 10:44:55    |
      From: johnturmel@gmail.com              TURMEL: Court orders 4 separate medpot permit appeals              JCT: This was just emailled out:              TO : Judicial Administrator       FROM : Stratas J.A.       DATE : April 1, 2019       RE : Arthur Jackes v. Her Majesty the Queen (A-294-18),       Allen J. Harris v. AGC (A-258-18), and Her Majesty the Queen       v. Igor Mozajko (A-339-18)               DIRECTION       J: Three appeals have been placed before the Court for       direction. This direction shall be sent to all the parties       in the three appeals and shall be placed in each of the       three files.              JCT: Actually, "four" appeals have been placed before the       Court, they forgot Kent Truman.              J: The Court notes the different parties and the different       first-instance decisions involved. The facts vary among the       files.              JCT: But the issues are the same.              J: The Court also notes that the appeals are likely to be       heard at different locations.              JCT: Unless you agree to hear them all at one.              J: Finally, the appeals are at different stages of progress.              JCT: arguments on the same issues are at different stages of       progress which is why they want to piggy back onto Jeff but       get the chance to add their two cents.              J: All of this leads the Court to the view that the files       should proceed separately and be heard separately.              JCT: What a waste of time.              J: To the extent a ruling in one file affects another later       file, this can be brought to the attention of the Court       through submissions made at the hearing in the later file.              JCT: Here we are trying to avoid hearings in later files by       being there with their file that can be brought to the next       judges' attention?              J: There are no other motions presently before the Court.       But some of the correspondence suggests some relief is       desired by some. If a party wishes some relief, it should       now file a formal motion in writing seeking that relief.              JCT: OK. He gave them an out. File an official motion asking       to be joined to Jeff.              J: File A-258-18 is now ready for hearing; a requisition for       hearing has been filed. A hearing date in file A-258-18       should now be set notwithstanding the existence of the other       files.              JCT: Notice there is no decision now on whether to have       telephonie multi-appeal hearing. Yet. Official motions       coming up.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca