From: johnturmel@gmail.com   
      
   TURMEL: Court nixes Jackes with Harris MedPot appeal   
      
   JCT: We just found out that the appeal for Allan J. Harris'   
   restitution of the subtracted permit time and the Crown's   
   striking all the claims for damages due to delay is going to   
   be heard in the week of June 24 2019.   
      
   Federal Court of Appeal Justice Gauthier ruled on Arthur   
   Jackes' motion to have his appeal heard with Jeff Harris':   
      
   Date: 20190513   
                     FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL   
      
   Date: 20190513   
   Docket: A-294-18   
      
   Ottawa, Ontario, May 13, 2019   
      
   Present:  GAUTHIER J.A.   
      
   BETWEEN:   
                      HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN   
                                                     Respondent   
                               and   
                          ARTHUR JACKES   
                                                      Appellant   
      
                              ORDER   
      
   UPON the appellant's motion made in writing that his appeal   
   be expedited and set down for hearing, together with the   
   appeal in Allan Harris v. AGoC (A-258-18);   
      
   HAVING reviewed the materials filed, including the reply   
   filed late by the appellant;   
      
   UPON considering the direction of Stratas J.A.. and that the   
   appeal in A-258-18 will take place in Vancouver during the   
   week of June 24, 2019;   
      
   UPON noting that the explanations provided by Mr. Jackes do   
   not add anything significant in respect of the concerns   
   raised by Stratas J.A. when he issued his direction on April   
   1 2019.   
      
   UPON considering that at this stage, no Requisition for   
   Hearing has been filed in the present appeal. Thus, it is   
   not even clear if Mr. Jackes is available that week. I have   
   carefully reviewed the two decisions that are the subject of   
   both appeals and reviewed the files' history before the   
   Federal Court, as set out in the respondent's responding   
   record. It is clear that Mr. Jackes always insisted to   
   proceed on his own, contrary to the many other files where   
   the applicants were willing to have their proceedings   
   stayed, while Mr. Harris' application, the lead file,   
   proceeded. In fact, the Appellant expressly requested to be   
   heard before the Federal Court.   
      
   UPON determining that, like Stratas J.A., I am not satisfied   
   that this appeal should be expedited and set for a hearing   
   together with A-258-18. The Court is not satisfied that   
   these appeals, which were filed at different locations, and   
   involve different issues, even if related, should be heard   
   together or one after the other.   
      
   THIS COURT ORDERS that the motion is dismissed.   
   "Johanne Gauthier" J.A.   
      
   JCT: Okay, so Art will ask the Crown what days they can't   
   make it and prepare a Requisition for Hearing - Appeal by   
   next week.   
      
   Then file a motion in writing for an extension of time to   
   file the Requisition because he was only late in trying to   
   get in with Jeff's hearing.   
      
   And he can still ask that his appeal hearing be with Jeff in   
   the week of June 24!! Har har har har har har. Another kick   
   at the can.   
      
   JCT: Even if the Crown puts down that they're not available   
   on the dates of Jeff's hearing, we'll ask anyway.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)