From: johnturmel@gmail.com   
      
   TURMEL: Art Jackes seeks extension to requisition appeal   
      
   JCT: Art Jackes's documentation for his appeal was complete   
   but rather than requisition his own appeal hearing date in   
   Toronto, he made a motion to be heard by telephone at the   
   same time as the Jeff Harris appeal in Vancouver. His motion   
   was dismissed for lack of requisition and so Art has filed a   
   Motion for an extension of time to requisition his appeal   
   date.   
      
   We wanted to keep things moving so we wanted to include the   
   Requisition with the suggested dates. So Art had written the   
   Crown asking what dates they weren't available in the next 3   
   months. And of course, to slow things down so we get two   
   appeal panels instead of one, Wendy Wright refused to give   
   him the dates they were not free until the extension of time   
   to file it had been received.   
      
   So Art filed his Motion asking for the extension of time:   
      
   Court File No.: A-294-18   
                     FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL   
   BETWEEN:   
                          ARTHUR JACKES   
                                                     Appellant   
                               and   
                      HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN   
                                                     Respondent   
      
                         NOTICE OF MOTION   
      
   TAKE NOTICE that the Appellant will make a motion to the   
   court on the basis of written representations for an order   
   extending the time to file the Requisition for hearing of   
   appeal.   
      
   THE GROUNDS FOR THE MOTION are that Appellant will   
   requisition that the appeal be heard if possible by   
   telephone on June 27 2019 with the live Vancouver appeal of   
   Allan J. Harris A-258-18 because my Memorandum provides more   
   arguments on the very same issue of delay from the   
   "unsupported application rejection on the basis of non-   
   originality of the signatures."   
   Dated at Toronto on May 27 2019.   
   ________________________________   
   Arthur Jackes   
   For the Appellant   
      
                     WRITTEN REPRESENTATIONS   
      
   1. I was one of over 300 plaintiffs below for whom Allan J.   
   Harris is Lead Plaintiff who will be arguing the same issue   
   raised in my appeal.   
      
   2. My claim is for damages due to delay by unsupported   
   rejection of application on the basis of non-originality of   
   the signatures as raised by other plaintiffs.   
      
   3. When my motion for interim exemption pending processing   
   of my application was mooted by delivery of the permit, the   
   action for damages over the 13-week delay was also dismissed   
   as too trivial for Charter relief despite the Crown's motion   
   to strike the action of Donald Cote for damages over four   
   "not original signature" rejections that caused an 8-month   
   delay was dismissed.   
      
   4. I appealed from the Aug 28 2018 Order of Federal Court   
   Justice Brown in the action in T-1564-17 striking my action   
   for damages and seeking it be re-instituted below.   
      
   5. With the Memoranda completed, my Requisition for hearing   
   of appeal was served on Canada on time but then was rejected   
   by the Registry for technical reasons and was late.   
      
   6. I filed a motion to be heard with Harris, dismissed on   
   May 13 2019 by Stratas J.A. for want of a Requisition.   
      
   7. Canada refused to provide the dates they were not   
   available for the hearing until the extension of time has   
   been granted so I could not file a Requisition for a hearing   
   date with this motion.   
      
   8. The appeal in Allan J. Harris v. HMQ A-258-18 is to be   
   heard on June 27 2019 in Vancouver.   
      
   9. I now seek such extension of time to file a Requisition   
   for hearing of appeal which will also ask that my appeal be   
   heard by telephone on June 27 2019 with the appeal of Allan   
   J. Harris A-258-18 if still possible.   
      
   10. Canada had pointed out that the Harris decision could be   
   brought to the attention of my panel and will no doubt also   
   point out that a different decision contradicting the Harris   
   decision from my panel would violate the principles of stare   
   decisis and judicial comity. Appellant wishes his stronger   
   arguments to be heard by the Harris panel to avoid such   
   possibility.   
   Dated at Toronto on May 27 2019.   
   ____________________________   
   Arthur Jackes   
      
   JCT: Harris's appeal is slated for June 27 2019. The Crown   
   has 10 days to Respond until June 6 and I'd bet they're   
   going to waste the whole 10 days. Next day, June 7, Art   
   files a Reply and it goes to the judge.   
      
   Say it's granted on June 8. Still 19 days until Jeff's   
   appeal to request the Crown's dates of availability and get   
   the Requisition filed as soon as possible hoping it's   
   possible to let Art's appeal be heard with Jeff's.   
      
   So the only variable is   
   1) how long it takes for the court to grant the extension of   
   time for Requisition   
   2) how long it takes the Crown to provide the dates,   
   3) how long it takes to give Art a date or slate him with   
   Harris.   
      
   I can't imagine the extension of time for booking a hearing   
   being refused on a completed file. It always takes a 3-judge   
   panel to dismiss an appeal and the reason for not hearing   
   the appeal would be that he didn't book his date on time and   
   they don't want to give him an extension! Unheard of!   
      
   And if we don't get in on the Harris appeal, the Crown gets   
   to waste a live hearing before a second panel of 3 judges on   
   the very same issue but with different facts. Har har har   
   har har har.   
      
   Under normal guerrilla law circumstances, I'd be the one   
   wanting separate appeals to waste twice as much court time   
   as possible. And Mozajko a third panel to waste even more   
   time. So let's see what happens.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)