Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    can.legal    |    Debating Canuck legal system quirks    |    10,932 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 10,542 of 10,932    |
|    John KingofthePaupers Turmel to All    |
|    TURMEL: Bela Beke challenges medpot grow    |
|    07 Aug 19 01:16:15    |
      From: johnturmel@gmail.com              TURMEL: Bela Beke challenges medpot grower 10-year criminal record check              JCT: I've been wanting to challenge the ban on people with       criminal records for cannabis offences in the past 10 years       from participating in the marijuana agriculture industry.              So Bela Beke who received a fine instead of a life sentence       for 10 pounds of marijuana volunteered. He has his exemption       but his criminal record stands in the way of his becoming a       Designated Person to grow for others.               File No: T-1262-19        FEDERAL COURT       Between:        Bela Beke        Plaintiff        AND        Her Majesty The Queen        Defendant               STATEMENT OF CLAIM        (Pursuant to S.48 of the Federal Court Act)              1. The Plaintiff seeks a declaration that the requirement of       a Criminal Record check preventing those convicted of a       cannabis offence in the past 10 years from acting as a       Designated Person to grow marijuana under Section 311(2)(a),       Section 312(4)(c)(i), and Section 312(4)(d) be struck as       unconstitutionally violating the S.7 Charter Right to       Liberty, Security of citizens who have paid their debt to       society and want to join the cannabis industry and go       straight not in accordance with principles of fundamental       justice to not be arbitrary, grossly disproportional,       unnecessary.              PARTIES              2. The Plaintiff has a criminal record for a cannabis       offence.              3. The Defendant, Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada,       as represented by the Attorney General of Canada, is named       as the representative of the Federal Government of Canada       and the Minister of Health for Canada who is the Minister       responsible for Health Canada and certain aspects of the       Controlled Drugs and Substances Act including the Cannabis       Act and the Cannabis Regulations.              4. Section 311(2) states:               An individual is not eligible to be a designated person        if, within the preceding 10 years, they        (a) have been convicted, as an adult, of a designated        offence or a controlled substance offence;              5. Section 312(4)(c)(i) states:        If cannabis is to be produced by a designated person,        the application must include a declaration by the        designated person that contains        (c) an indication that        (i) within the 10 years preceding the day on which the        declaration is made, they have not been convicted of an        offence referred to in paragraph 311(2)(a) or (b) or        received a sentence referred to in paragraph 311(2)(c)        or (d),              6. Section 312(4)(d) requires:        (d) a document, issued by a Canadian police force within        the 90 days preceding the date on which the application        is submitted, establishing that, within the 10 years        preceding the date on which the document is issued, the        designated person has not been convicted of an offence        referred to in paragraph 311(2)(a) or received a        sentence referred to in paragraph 311(2)(c).              7. Having served my sentence in the war of Cops and       Gardeners, the Government has provided no cogent reason why       I should be made to wait 10 years before I can garden for       others.              16. The Plaintiff proposes this action be tried in the       City of Ottawa, Province of Ontario.              Dated at Ottawa on Aug 6 2019.       _________________________________________       Bela Beke              JCT: Simple enough! Why keep punishing people who were       illegally in the business from getting into the legal       business? Extra punishment? Revenge? Crown gets to explain       why it's important that he not be able to grow for others       until his 10 years penance has elapsed.              So, two new issues for the Federal Court to deal with       in Trudeau's attempt to corner the market for the big boys.       Did anyone vote for Trudeau last time?              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca