From: johnturmel@gmail.com   
      
   JCT: The Crown has sent all the almost 300 plaintiffs with   
   actions for short-staffing delays in processing their   
   permits a copy of their nasty letter asking Judge Brown to   
   make them file responses as to why their cases should not be   
   dismissed given with loss of the Lead Plaintiff appeal,   
      
   We argued it was premature until Jeff gets back from the   
   Supreme Court and Brown said he'd wait to see what happens   
   before ordering anything to compel everyone to run around.   
      
   But given we now have the ruling but also have the Igor   
   Mozajko appeal coming on exactly the same reasons since   
   Brown adopted the Harris decision for Mozajko, Igor had the   
   chance to add arguments the Harris court said were lacking!   
   And his appeal was slated for Nov 13 except the Crown got it   
   delayed. So only a few more months before Igor gets to take   
   it to the top. So why the rush. Here's why:   
      
   Ministry of Justice   
      
   Nov 27, 2019   
   VIA FAX   
      
   Federal Court   
      
   CR: Dear Sir/Madam:   
      
   re:  Allan J. Harris v. HMTQ T-1379-17 and A-258-18   
        Igor Mozajkov. HMTQ T-92-18 and A-339-18   
      
   We are writing on behalf of the defendant, HMTQ ("Canada").   
   We ask that you kindly place this letter before the case-   
   management judge in these matters, the Honorable Mr. Justice   
   Brown.   
      
   Further to the Direction dated October 15 2019, in Allan J.   
   Harris v. HMTQ (the "Harris action"), please be advised that   
   Mr. Harris has not sought leave to appeal to the Supreme   
   Court of Canada and that the time for him to do so has now   
   passed. We therefore reiterate the requests for procedural   
   relief contained in our letter of Oct 3 2019.   
      
   By letter dated Nov 21, 2019, the plaintiff in Igor   
   Mozajko v. HMTQ (the "Mozajko action") requests that the   
   Court "postpone any action on the other plaintiffs" while   
   the appeal and cross appeal of this Court's Oct 2 2019   
   decision in Mozajko action are pending. This request should   
   be refused.   
      
   JCT: That's right. Since Judge Brown adopted his Harris   
   decision for Igor, Igor gets to appeal the essence of the   
   Harris decision like Harris did, a double shot because the   
   Crown chose to deal with Igor separately, but Igor appeals   
   later when we have read what Harris' court said and have   
   added a Supplementary Memorandum of rebuttals to the Harris   
   Court. Including them not dealing with the actual issue of   
   the appeal.   
   And it's Oct 2 2018.   
      
   CR: The Court has designated the Harris action as the lead   
   action and has ordered that determinations in the Harris   
   action be used to determine the remaining actions. Mr.   
   Mozajko has identified no reason to depart from these   
   orders,   
      
   JCT: He identified that he is raising the very same   
   arguments in his appeal that Judge Brown was waiting for in   
   the Jeff Harris appeal. If the appeal is slated soon, add 2   
   months to inform Judge Brown that the application has been   
   filed at the top and we're in exactly the same situation but   
   a few months later. Ahhh.   
      
   CR: nor is there any reason to believe the Federal Court of   
   Appeal will depart from its decision in the Harris action in   
   Mr. Mozajko's case.   
      
   JCT: Well, there is reason to believe the Federal Court of   
   Appeal will depart from the previous decision on Restitution   
   when they made no decision on the Remedy (B) issue on   
   appeal.   
      
   CR: To the extent that Mr. Mozajko is seeking relief on   
   behalf of the other plaintiffs, his request also offends   
   Rule 119, which does not permit representation by persons   
   other than a solicitor.   
      
   JCT: He's not acting as their representative. He is simply   
   becoming the precedent that Judge Brown had ordered Harris   
   to be and is only saying not to dismiss everyone's actions   
   or make them run around filing paperwork until Igor's   
   identical action is finally dealt with because if his wins,   
   Brown would have been premature to force the patients to   
   respond before it is necessary.   
      
   Jon Bricker, Wendy Wright   
      
   JCT: So Igor faxed back:   
      
   Igor Mozajko   
      
   Friday Nov 29 2019   
   VIA EMAIl FACSIMILE   
      
   Federal Court Court Administrator:   
      
   re:  Allan J. Harris v. HMTQ T-1379-17 and A-258-18   
        Igor Mozajko. HMTQ T-92-18 and A-339-18   
      
   I write in reply to the Defendant's Nov 27 2019 letter in   
   response opposing postponing any decision on plaintiffs for   
   whom Allan J. Harris was Lead Plaintiff until the   
   disposition of my appeals upon the same and added arguments   
   as Harris.   
      
   The Crown reiterates the requests for procedural relief   
   contained in their letter of Oct 3 2019, such relief for   
   self-represented patients to file documentation.   
      
   The only reason given is that this Court designated the Harris   
   action as the lead action and that only determinations in the   
   Harris action be used to determine the remaining actions,   
   that I have identified no reason to depart from these   
   orders. I did identify that my appeals would have the same   
   effect to validate your decisions as the Harris appeals.   
      
   The Crown sees no reason to believe the Federal Court of   
   Appeal will depart from its decision in the Harris action in   
   Mr. Mozajko's case. I did point out how the Court of Appeal   
   omitted dealing with the original Harris appeal issue,   
   restitution of the short-changed time. If the Crown argues   
   there is no reason they will not ignore it again, that   
   remains to be seen. I submit there is reason to believe the   
   Court of Appeal will depart from the previous decision to   
   omit adjudicating the Remedy (B) issue on appeal.   
      
   The Crown argues I am seeking relief on behalf of others   
   while not being qualified, I am not acting as their   
   representative and am simply informing the Court that the   
   adjudication of the Harris appeal was not filed because it   
   was decided to have me take the more complete arguments to   
   the top rather than Mr. Harris.   
      
   If your decisions should be sustained, it would have then   
   been premature to act before my appeals of your decision are   
   exhausted as it would have been premature to act before the   
   Harris appeals were exhausted.   
   ________________________________   
   Igor Mozajko   
   CC: Jon Bricker   
      
   JCT: So now Judge Brown can order the plaintiffs to all file   
   a response as to why their claims should not be dismissed.   
   And they'll all get a 1-pager answering because Igor hasn't   
   been dismissed yet and if wins, he's back with them and they   
   all stay in.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)