From: johnturmel@gmail.com   
      
   JCT: Scott's got an early mail that the damages cases had   
   been dismissed and posted a hearty laugh. After all, he had   
   asked that everyone's actions for damages be dismissed and   
   he did get what he asked for.   
      
   Let's give him credit. He's been moving the court to dismiss   
   all the cases thrown out for a long time now and has finally   
   succeeded. So everyone's actions for damages for what they   
   lost over the delay seem to be over.   
      
   I'm amazed Judge Brown dismissed everyone's cases before   
   finding out if the Court of Appeal overturns the other Court   
   of Appeal decision overturning his win for us. I wonder why   
   they didn't post the dismissals on their Registry files for   
   so long?   
      
   So the situation remains.   
      
   Steve Vetricek filed an opposition to the Crown's request   
   that his case not be thrown out before the Mozajko appeal of   
   the Harris decision throwing out Brown's decision for our   
   side. So I can imagine those who did not oppose may be gone   
   but don't know if Steve's action is gone. If it is, he can   
   appeal too.   
      
   But if Mozajko should win and get the Brown decision back in   
   force, then Vetricek is ready to go with Mozajko and   
   Harris for their damages claims even if the others are   
   no longer on the bench but in the bleachers.   
      
   Should they win their damages, do you think those who had   
   their cases dismissed because of a bad decision can be   
   reinstated or will they have to file a new action again to   
   get in on the cash?   
      
   I guess Brown might have the power to reinstate everyone if   
   his decision is upheld rather than make everyone file again.   
      
   Wild situation.   
      
   Lucky for me nobody took my $20 bet that Scott was   
   delusional if the Registry didn't show it. I wouldn't have   
   taken the bet either but the Registry was off and Scott   
   didn't produce any proof.   
      
   Bets off for any idiots out there who think it might still   
   be on.   
      
   Here is Scott's post from my Facebook page crowing about   
   getting everyone's actions thrown out. May as well let Scott   
   enjoy his victory in getting everyone else's cases   
   dismissed.   
      
   Scott McCluskey to John Turmel   
   April 2 1:06 AM .   
      
   I WARNED YOU ALL THIS DAY WOULD COME !   
      
   "Mr. Turmel seems to be real quiet lately over his   
   engineered court cases crashing and burning, run by Mr.   
   Turmel's SPOCK Puppets.   
      
   JCT: I don't think those who used my motions to speed up   
   their permits are feeling all that bad.   
      
   SM: Order dated April 27 2020 by Justice Henry S. Brown of the   
   Federal Court Ottawa DISMISSED All 448 Delay/Damages cases,   
      
   JCT: I didn't know there were that many.   
      
   SM:and those left on Schedule A some 299 that opted to stay in,   
   hoping for a miracle.   
      
   JCT: So does it apply to 299 or to 448?   
      
   SM: This debacle was administered by Allan Jeffrey Harris,   
   lead/representative plaintiff, overseeing all these cases.   
   Harris broke a record for most cases lost in one fell   
   swoop!!   
      
   JCT: Actually, the Crown holds the record for most cases lost   
   in one fell swoop back in 2003 when my appeal made them drop   
   4,000 charges.   
      
   Harris was found on 2 occasions on ORDERS granted to myself   
   by Justice Brown, proving Harris was antagonistic, would not   
   take any input from any person involved in these cases and   
   failed to do his duties. Despite asking Justice Brown for an   
   email list of all co-plaintiffs Harris claimed he needed to   
   keep persons up to date and discuss strategy etc. Harris to   
   my knowledge never once contacted anyone, including myself   
   to keep us updated, informed or to get our input. He did not   
   do his duties.   
      
   On Orders dated Sept 24 2019 and a subsequent Order dated   
   Jan 13 2020, Harris was removed from my 2 cases for not   
   doing his DUTIES as lead/representative plaintiff. Harris   
   posted many times "what duties, I have no duties, show me   
   the duties", as he was clearly negligent, in not even   
   knowing his duties, when he accepted the role of   
   Lead/Representative plaintiff.   
      
   JCT: Pack of lies. Harris as Lead Plaintiff meant first to   
   go, not representing the others. The Crown and the Judge   
   many times told Scott that Harris had no duty to represent   
   him, he was only going first. That Scott's still pushing the   
   same delusion that Jeff did something wrong to Scott by   
   first does show his mental state. After the court has   
   told him Harris has no duty to him. he's still with the same   
   sickness..   
      
   SM: Now Harris had an opportunity to save the 448 cases, by   
   going to The SCC after Harris lost in the appellate court   
   and was assessed court costs. All Harris had to do was   
   follow Turmel's advice and take it to the SCC and win!   
      
   JCT: And instead, Mozajko is appealing the Harris decision   
   at the Court of Appeal with more complete arguments (now   
   that they told us what they thought was wrong or missing)   
   and he'll take it to the Supreme Court. Guess Scott would   
   have prefered Jeff take the weaker case to the top. Just   
   goes to show how bright he's not for blaming Jeff for not   
   going with the less complete case. Missed his chance to   
   laugh?   
      
   SM:I recall a post by Harris at the time, that indicated he   
   was rather upset with Turmel's legal advice when he stated   
   "you keep having me file these loser cases and call them   
   winners" 0/448 cases lost. Now thats a record!   
      
   JCT: Guess Scott doesn't count the hundred people who got   
   hop-to-it permits with their $2 investment.   
      
   SM: So it appears Harris let us down again, when he didn't   
   fulfill his obligations to see the cases all the way to the   
   SCC. WHY? Turmel claimed he would win!   
      
   JCT: Scott knows Mozajko is appealing the Harris   
   decision to the top. Wonder why he doesn't mention the   
   other route. I wonder. Just to misrepresent?   
      
   SM:So what says Jeff Harris, on why he did not take all our   
   cases to the Supreme Court of Canada? Why?   
      
   JCT: How many times does he have to told that Mozajko's   
   doing that with more complete arguments? I've repeated it   
   endlessly but it seems to go in one ear and out the other.   
   What can you say about someone who knows they're repeating   
   something untrue? Sick?   
      
   SM: Tell us Jeff why you let 448 cases get dismissed, when   
   you could have gone to the SCC as I recall you claimed to us   
   all, you would?"   
      
   JCT: Jeff didn't let them get dismissed. Igor can do that if   
   he stops before the top.   
      
   Of course, the hundred or so people who filed motions in   
   their $2 actions to get their permits processed faster may   
   not feel so bad about losing their $2 entry fee.   
      
   Notice how Scott doesn't mention that Judge Brown awarded no   
   costs for trying. When you lose your action and the judge   
   orders no costs for the other side, it does punish the other   
   side. The did all that work and have to pay for it   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)