From: johnturmel@gmail.com   
      
   https://youtu.be/pWLqrd72UfM   
      
   JCT: I was the Professor at the Trump Taj Mahal and i'm   
   gonna tell you some moves that The Don could do that no one   
   else has yet mentioned.  now most people are aware that   
   Trump was accused of calling the Nazis "fine people" in   
   Charlottesville and Joe Biden has repeated that in this   
   campaign, as have many other democrats, that trump said that   
   the Nazis were "fine people" in Charlottesville. Fine people   
   on both sides.   
      
   Now there were four groups there. Antifa against the Nazis   
   and the pro statue people against the anti-statue people.   
   You got it? Two fights going on, not one.   
      
   Now when Trump said there were fine people on both sides,   
   his original statement which hadn't been qualified by "not   
   the Nazis," he said that in paragraph two, but when he said   
   the fine people on both sides, do you think he was calling   
   Antifa and the Nazis the fine people on both sides of their   
   fight or do you think he was calling the fine people on both   
   sides of the statue fight? Now it's as stupid to think that   
   Trump would have called Antifa "fine people" as to say that   
   he called the Nazis who were fighting with them on the other   
   side "fine people." So it was it's completely impossible   
   that Trump could have said the "fine people on both sides,"   
   he was talking about Nazis and Antifa Commies. Okay, he had   
   to be talking about the statue people but then later in   
   paragraph two, he clarified. He said: I'm not talking about   
   the Nazis and the white supremacists. I'm talking about the   
   statue people. So the whole story was available in two   
   parts.   
      
   Now what the media did was they cut out part two when he   
   said not the Nazis and then they made this statement that   
   when he said find people on both sides, one of those sides   
   was the Nazis without mentioning the other side had to be   
   Antifa. Not the statue people! Got it? So that's what they   
   call the "fine people hoax,"  I call it "Nazis are fine   
   people hoax" because that was the true gist.   
      
   Now here's the point. Almost everybody has seen the moral   
   question: "if you could have shot Hitler before world war II   
   and you had the chance, would you have?" So if you would   
   have how about "worse than Hitler Trump?" Would you shoot   
   Trump? How can you say no so when you call somebody a Nazi?   
   worse than Hitler? You're inviting some lunatic to take them   
   out and you'll applaud: "well done you saved us from worse   
   than Hitler."   
      
   So that is the vilest dirtiest murderous slander imaginable   
   to call somebody a Nazi in case some nuts decides: "I'm   
   going to save the planet and kill him before it's too late."   
   And that's what they did to Trump, okay? They've smeared him   
   as a Nazi in a completely illogical situation. He couldn't   
   have been talking about the Nazis because he would have been   
   talking about Antifa. And you don't like antifa, right? had   
   to be the statue people. And only the media made the   
   allegation that he was talking about the Nazis by cutting   
   out paragraph two.   
      
   Now that is called a lie by omission. That is the absolute   
   easiest lie to prove because you can just show it: Here,   
   there it is. Here's what he said:   
   "You also had people that were fine people, on both sides."   
   (Statue Pro-Con) or (Nazi-Antifa)   
   "I'm not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white   
   nationalist - because they should be condemned totally."   
      
   You got that? First statement, second statement. And they   
   went and lied and cut out the second statement.   
      
   So imagine now Trump's facing Biden on stage and he says:   
   You called me a Nazi. You said I said "Nazis are fine   
   people." And yet in paragraph two, it says not. You lied by   
   omission to smear me and invite people to kill me because   
   I'm worse than Hitler. You smeared me i need an apology   
   right now. You cut out paragraph two and lied about me. you   
   got to apologize right now now. What's Biden gonna do? If he   
   tries to say I'm not apologizing I'd slap him right in the   
   face and then tell a judge: Hey the guy invited people to   
   kill me by smearing me with a lie by omission and I slapped   
   him in the face, he deserved it." What do you want to punish   
   me with? It would be the slap heard around the world and a   
   worthy one because they smeared him, they invited lunatics   
   to kill him, by saying he's worse than Hitler and everybody   
   knows everybody would kill Hitler if they could, right?   
   So that is the dirtiest smear ever and it's a lie by   
   omission the easiest kind of lie to prove right in his face.   
   Paragraph one, paragraph two, you cut out paragraph two to   
   smear me. Apologize!   
      
   Demanding an apology is the most powerful move Trump can do   
   in this situation. Not just have people out there proving   
   they're wrong by keep saying "paragraph two." Hey, Trump's   
   got to do it, the victim's got to do it. He's got to stand   
   up and say: You sumbitch, you lied by omission and smeared   
   me as a Nazi. you apologize. And again, if he doesn't I give   
   him a serious smack across, not punch, not kicking the nuts,   
   not punching the throat, no no, slap across the face. You   
   know a slap, so there's nothing too serious   
      
   So that is the first trump card he can use which is almost   
   like a judo move. This is the dirtiest sleaziest thing they   
   can throw at him and he gets to turn it around, prove it's a   
   fraud and a smear and demand an apology in public. And if   
   the guy doesn't do anything, them's fighting words. He could   
   even say "them's fighting words" and Biden says: Tough luck   
   I'm sticking with it," whack.  so two two septuagenarians   
   fighting it out, slapping it out.   
      
   So now the second one. Now the Trump card is now for every   
   democrat who used the nazis or fine people misstatement.   
   They're all vulnerable. they can all be made to apologize.   
   Now you're not going to slap them. Only trump can do that   
   but anybody else can just say: "hey you lied by omission,   
   you smeared someone, you invited people to kill this guy,   
   you've got to apologize. You were lying by omission. Wow so   
   every single Democrat who mentioned Charlottesville in   
   passing as some kind of proof of Trump's evil can be whacked   
   with the Charlottesville big lie of omission. All right? So   
   every Democrat is vulnerable now that they've pulled this   
   super super sleazy lie by omission in public they cannot   
   deny. And they're all vulnerable.   
      
   And finally the second one, no one talks about it, But the   
   impeachment, the attempted impeachment, whoa, they have no   
   idea what they did. Now, first of all, the Constitution says   
   the House has to have a vote to set up an Impeachment   
   Committee to issue subpoenas to witnesses in public. So you   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)