From: johnturmel@gmail.com   
      
   TURMEL: Letter to Chief Justice Crampton on Prothonotary   
      
   JCT: Chief Justice Crampton appointed a Prothonotary as Case   
   Management Judge without the full powers of a judge. It   
   could cause problems:   
      
   John C. Turmel, B.Eng.,   
   Tel/Fax: 519-753-5122, Cell: 226-966-4754   
      
   Tuesday Mar 1 2021   
      
   VIA EMAIl   
      
   Chief Administrator   
   Courts Administration Service   
      
   Dear Sir or Madam:   
      
        re: John Turmel v. HMTQ T-130-21   
      
   Could you please place this letter about the Feb 26 2021   
   Order of Chief Justice Crampton appointing a prothonotary to   
   be Case Management Judge for our actions before him.   
      
   In my past template actions with two large groups of self-   
   represented plaintiffs, a judge was appointed Case   
   Management Judge. I am unfamiliar with how the appointment   
   of a prothonotary as case management judge should differ.   
      
   I am aware that Rule 51(1) allows that "An order of a   
   prothonotary may be appealed by a motion to a judge of the   
   Federal Court."   
      
   I am aware that Rule 50(1) allows that a prothonotary may   
   hear any motion other than:   
      
        (c) a motion for summary judgment or summary trial.   
      
   Given Her Majesty The Queen is in default of filing a   
   Statement of Defence within the required 30 days, though a   
   motion for summary judgment may not be sought before a   
   prothonotary, may a motion for Default Judgment be sought   
   before a prothonotary? If not, how should Plaintiff proceed   
   should default Judgment be sought?   
      
        (e) for an injunction;   
      
   This is an action seeking an injunction prohibiting Covid   
   restrictions. How should Plaintiff proceed should interim   
   injunction be sought?   
      
   If the prothonotary may not hear a plaintiff motion for   
   injunctive remedy, may a prothonotary hear a defendant's   
   motion to strike a claim for injunctive remedy? How should   
   the Crown proceed should striking the claim be sought?   
      
        (l) for the certification of an action or an   
        application as a class proceeding.   
      
   There are now over 50 Plaintiffs. How should Plaintiffs   
   proceed should class certification be sought?   
      
   I know final adjudication has to be by a judge and having a   
   prothonotary deal with administrative issues is no problem.   
   I only seek clarification on how motions a prothonotary may   
   not adjudicate should be dealt with?   
      
   Dated at Brantford on Tuesday Mar 2 2021.   
   _________________________   
   John C. Turmel   
      
   Cc: Benjamin Wong   
      
   JCT: What judge wants to hear motion to stop mass murder by   
   a hoax and have to let it continue?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)