Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    can.legal    |    Debating Canuck legal system quirks    |    10,932 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 10,650 of 10,932    |
|    John KingofthePaupers Turmel to All    |
|    TURMEL: Crown wants Covid Strike Motion     |
|    03 May 21 19:03:15    |
      From: johnturmel@gmail.com              TURMEL: Crown wants Covid Strike Motion Timetable to July!!              It's the second time the Crown forgets how Rules for S.369       motions in writing work. Notice in Michel Ethier's Appeal       Motion, he filed, Crown responded in 10 days, Ethier replied       in 4 days. Pursuant to the Rule 369.              Case Management Judge Prothonotary Mandy Aylen asked for a       timetable for the next steps in their Strike Motion. He       could have answered to go by the rules but instead proposed       an 87-day timeline. I objected to not following the rules.       So now he proposes to not follow the rules with a 77-day       timeline.              Department of Justice Canada       Ontario Regional Office National       Litigation Sector              Via E-mail to johnturmel@yahoo.com       Our File Number: LEX-500040961              April 30, 2021              Dear Mr. Turmel:               Re: TURMEL, John v HMQ (Court File No.: T-130-21)              CR: Further to the Court's April 26, 2021, Direction in the       above-noted matter, I am writing to propose the following       deadlines for Canada's motion to strike and for security for       costs under Rule 369:              Department of Justice Canada       Benjamin.Wong2 @ justice.gc.ca       Via E-mail to johnturmel@yahoo.com       Our File Number: LEX-500040961              May 3, 2021              Dear Mr. Turmel:               Re: TURMEL, John v HMQ (Court File No.: T-130-21)              I am writing in response to your letter dated May 2, 2021.       To expedite the determination of this matter, Canada is       willing to consent to 15 days for the service and filing of       Canada's Notice of Motion and Affidavits. Canada is also       willing to start the timeline for service and filing of its       Motion Record from the date that you advise that you will       not be filing an affidavit or participate in cross-       examinations. Canada's revised proposed schedule would be as       follows:              - Service and filing of Canada's Notice of Motion and       Affidavits: 15 days from the date that the Court implements       this schedule       - Service and filing of the Plaintiff's Affidavits: 15 days       from the date that Canada serves its Notice of Motion and       Affidavits       - Cross-examinations on affidavits: 10 days from the date       that the Plaintiff serves his Affidavits       - Service and filing of Canada's Motion Record: 15 days from       the expiration of the time for cross-examinations, or, if       the Plaintiff does not intend to serve an Affidavit or       conduct cross-examinations, within 15 days of Canada being       advised of this       - Service and filing of the Plaintiff's Responding Record:       15 days from the date that Canada serves its Motion Record       - Service and filing of Canada's Reply Submissions: 7 days       from the date that the Plaintiff serves his Responding       Record              Please let me know if this revised timetable is acceptable       to you. If not, pursuant to the Court's April 26, 2021,       please provide me with your availabilities for a case       management conference so I can advise the Court of our joint       availabilities. Sincerely, Benjamin Wong Counsel              JCT: It's obvious we're not going to agree. I want to go by       the Rules, he does not. But he's going to need to get an       order dispensing him with following the rules.              Right now, he's only got Prothonotary Aylen request for a       timeline, as if she doesn't know it's in the rules. So he's       pretending the timeline in the rules doesn't exist. Can't       let the judge know about the rules she doesn't seem to know.              I have an ace up my sleeve. Two actually. But I can't show       them until the Case Management Judge makes the mistake of       not following the rules, again.              So tomorrow, I'll write to him that I disagree with his new       77-day timeline as I disagreed with his original 87-day       timeline and suggest we both submit the timeline we want.       Mine, in the rules, his, not in the rules.              If she does not follow the rules, then the fireworks can       commence.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca