home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   can.legal      Debating Canuck legal system quirks      10,932 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 10,650 of 10,932   
   John KingofthePaupers Turmel to All   
   TURMEL: Crown wants Covid Strike Motion    
   03 May 21 19:03:15   
   
   From: johnturmel@gmail.com   
      
   TURMEL: Crown wants Covid Strike Motion Timetable to July!!   
      
   It's the second time the Crown forgets how Rules for S.369   
   motions in writing work. Notice in Michel Ethier's Appeal   
   Motion, he filed, Crown responded in 10 days, Ethier replied   
   in 4 days. Pursuant to the Rule 369.   
      
   Case Management Judge Prothonotary Mandy Aylen asked for a   
   timetable for the next steps in their Strike Motion. He   
   could have answered to go by the rules but instead proposed   
   an 87-day timeline. I objected to not following the rules.   
   So now he proposes to not follow the rules with a 77-day   
   timeline.   
      
   Department of Justice Canada   
   Ontario Regional Office National   
   Litigation Sector   
      
   Via E-mail to johnturmel@yahoo.com   
   Our File Number: LEX-500040961   
      
   April 30, 2021   
      
   Dear Mr. Turmel:   
      
        Re: TURMEL, John v HMQ (Court File No.: T-130-21)   
      
   CR: Further to the Court's April 26, 2021, Direction in the   
   above-noted matter, I am writing to propose the following   
   deadlines for Canada's motion to strike and for security for   
   costs under Rule 369:   
      
   Department of Justice Canada   
   Benjamin.Wong2 @ justice.gc.ca   
   Via E-mail to johnturmel@yahoo.com   
   Our File Number: LEX-500040961   
      
   May 3, 2021   
      
   Dear Mr. Turmel:   
      
        Re: TURMEL, John v HMQ (Court File No.: T-130-21)   
      
   I am writing in response to your letter dated May 2, 2021.   
   To expedite the determination of this matter, Canada is   
   willing to consent to 15 days for the service and filing of   
   Canada's Notice of Motion and Affidavits. Canada is also   
   willing to start the timeline for service and filing of its   
   Motion Record from the date that you advise that you will   
   not be filing an affidavit or participate in cross-   
   examinations. Canada's revised proposed schedule would be as   
   follows:   
      
   - Service and filing of Canada's Notice of Motion and   
   Affidavits: 15 days from the date that the Court implements   
   this schedule   
   - Service and filing of the Plaintiff's Affidavits: 15 days   
   from the date that Canada serves its Notice of Motion and   
   Affidavits   
   - Cross-examinations on affidavits: 10 days from the date   
   that the Plaintiff serves his Affidavits   
   - Service and filing of Canada's Motion Record: 15 days from   
   the expiration of the time for cross-examinations, or, if   
   the Plaintiff does not intend to serve an Affidavit or   
   conduct cross-examinations, within 15 days of Canada being   
   advised of this   
   - Service and filing of the Plaintiff's Responding Record:   
   15 days from the date that Canada serves its Motion Record   
   - Service and filing of Canada's Reply Submissions: 7 days   
   from the date that the Plaintiff serves his Responding   
   Record   
      
   Please let me know if this revised timetable is acceptable   
   to you. If not, pursuant to the Court's April 26, 2021,   
   please provide me with your availabilities for a case   
   management conference so I can advise the Court of our joint   
   availabilities. Sincerely, Benjamin Wong Counsel   
      
   JCT: It's obvious we're not going to agree. I want to go by   
   the Rules, he does not. But he's going to need to get an   
   order dispensing him with following the rules.   
      
   Right now, he's only got Prothonotary Aylen request for a   
   timeline, as if she doesn't know it's in the rules. So he's   
   pretending the timeline in the rules doesn't exist. Can't   
   let the judge know about the rules she doesn't seem to know.   
      
   I have an ace up my sleeve. Two actually. But I can't show   
   them until the Case Management Judge makes the mistake of   
   not following the rules, again.   
      
   So tomorrow, I'll write to him that I disagree with his new   
   77-day timeline as I disagreed with his original 87-day   
   timeline and suggest we both submit the timeline we want.   
   Mine, in the rules, his, not in the rules.   
      
   If she does not follow the rules, then the fireworks can   
   commence.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca