Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    can.legal    |    Debating Canuck legal system quirks    |    10,932 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 10,653 of 10,932    |
|    John KingofthePaupers Turmel to All    |
|    TURMEL: Crown 2.5-month timetable unacce    |
|    04 May 21 12:29:08    |
      From: johnturmel@gmail.com              TURMEL: Crown 2.5-month timetable unacceptable too.              JCT: The Crown dropped 10 days off their 3-month timetable       after I told them I wanted it in 2 weeks:              John C. Turmel, B.Eng.,              Tuesday May 4 2021              VIA EMAIl              Benjamin Wong       Department of Justice               re: John Turmel v. HMTQ T-130-21              You propose a 77-day timeline of steps for your in writing       S.369 motion to strike my claim:        Canada's revised proposed schedule would be as follows:        - Service and filing of Canada's Notice of Motion and        Affidavits: 15 days from the date that the Court        implements this schedule        - Service and filing of the Plaintiff's Affidavits: 15        days from the date that Canada serves its Notice of        Motion and Affidavits        - Cross-examinations on affidavits: 10 days from the        date that the Plaintiff serves his Affidavits        - Service and filing of Canada's Motion Record: 15 days        from the expiration of the time for cross-examinations,        or, if the Plaintiff does not intend to serve an        Affidavit or conduct cross-examinations, within 15 days        of Canada being advised of this        - Service and filing of the Plaintiff's Responding        Record: 15 days from the date that Canada serves its        Motion Record        - Service and filing of Canada's Reply Submissions: 7        days from the date that the Plaintiff serves his        Responding Record              Your 77-day timelineis is just as unacceptable as your       previous 87-day timeline when Rule 369 calls for my response       in 10 days and your Reply in 4 days.              Case Management Judge Prothonotary Aylen has asked for our       submission on timetable by May 5. It is obvious that I want       to follow the rules and you do not. Why would you abide by       the S.369 rule on timetable for the Ethier appeal motion and       not on this one?              I suggest you submit your timetable and I'll submit mine and       let the Prothonotary decide.              Dated at Brantford on Sunday May 4 2021.       _________________________       John C. Turmel       Cc: benjamin.wong2@justice.gc.ca              JCT: So I'll put in the timetable from the rules and she can       choose to follow the rules or give him extra time.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca