home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   can.legal      Debating Canuck legal system quirks      10,932 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 10,653 of 10,932   
   John KingofthePaupers Turmel to All   
   TURMEL: Crown 2.5-month timetable unacce   
   04 May 21 12:29:08   
   
   From: johnturmel@gmail.com   
      
   TURMEL: Crown 2.5-month timetable unacceptable too.   
      
   JCT: The Crown dropped 10 days off their 3-month timetable   
   after I told them I wanted it in 2 weeks:   
      
   John C. Turmel, B.Eng.,   
      
   Tuesday May 4 2021   
      
   VIA EMAIl   
      
   Benjamin Wong   
   Department of Justice   
      
        re: John Turmel v. HMTQ T-130-21   
      
   You propose a 77-day timeline of steps for your in writing   
   S.369 motion to strike my claim:   
       Canada's revised proposed schedule would be as follows:   
       - Service and filing of Canada's Notice of Motion and   
       Affidavits: 15 days from the date that the Court   
       implements this schedule   
       - Service and filing of the Plaintiff's Affidavits: 15   
       days from the date that Canada serves its Notice of   
       Motion and Affidavits   
       - Cross-examinations on affidavits: 10 days from the   
       date that the Plaintiff serves his Affidavits   
       - Service and filing of Canada's Motion Record: 15 days   
       from the expiration of the time for cross-examinations,   
       or, if the Plaintiff does not intend to serve an   
       Affidavit or conduct cross-examinations, within 15 days   
       of Canada being advised of this   
       - Service and filing of the Plaintiff's Responding   
       Record: 15 days from the date that Canada serves its   
       Motion Record   
       - Service and filing of Canada's Reply Submissions: 7   
       days from the date that the Plaintiff serves his   
       Responding Record   
      
   Your 77-day timelineis is just as unacceptable as your   
   previous 87-day timeline when Rule 369 calls for my response   
   in 10 days and your Reply in 4 days.   
      
   Case Management Judge Prothonotary Aylen has asked for our   
   submission on timetable by May 5. It is obvious that I want   
   to follow the rules and you do not. Why would you abide by   
   the S.369 rule on timetable for the Ethier appeal motion and   
   not on this one?   
      
   I suggest you submit your timetable and I'll submit mine and   
   let the Prothonotary decide.   
      
   Dated at Brantford on Sunday May 4 2021.   
   _________________________   
   John C. Turmel   
   Cc: benjamin.wong2@justice.gc.ca   
      
   JCT: So I'll put in the timetable from the rules and she can   
   choose to follow the rules or give him extra time.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca