From: johnturmel@gmail.com   
      
   TURMEL: Judge Aylen nixes "Fudge Mortality Rates" action   
      
   JCT: Remember, Prothonotary Mandy Aylen has known about them   
   fudging the mortality rates from the start. After trying to   
   stall our action for 5 months, successfully for 4 months,   
   she has now dismissed our actions making sure no one else   
   finds out they took toxic jab and she knew it was not needed   
   all along for a death rate 1/3 of the Flu.   
      
   Date: 20210712   
   Docket: T-130-21   
   Ottawa, Ontario, July 12, 2021   
   PRESENT: Case Management Judge Mandy Aylen   
   BETWEEN:   
                          JOHN C. TURMEL   
                                                     Plaintiff   
                               and   
                      HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN   
                                                     Defendant   
                              ORDER   
   [1] The Court is case managing a group of 74 actions in   
   which the self-represented Plaintiffs seek various forms of   
   relief related to the federal Government's COVID-19   
   mitigation measures.   
      
   JCT: Mainly a declaration that lockdowns are unjustified by   
   a trick pandemic.   
      
   J: The Statements of Claim in each action are almost   
   identical and based on a "kit claim" made available on the   
   internet by John Turmel, the Plaintiff in this action. By   
   Order dated April 8, 2021, the Court ordered that all other   
   actions be stayed pending the final determination (by   
   judgment or order) of this action and any appeal therefrom.   
   Accordingly, at present, only T-130-21 is moving forward.   
      
   [2] In his Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff alleges that:   
       116. All of the world's elected politicians fell for the   
       Apple-Orange Comparison and only Guinness Record never-   
       elected-100-times politician John Turmel did not.   
       117. The Prime Minister and his Government have been   
       duped by the most elementary trick in statistics,   
       comparing apples to oranges to exaggerate the threat by   
       a hundredfold, duped by an unproven theory of   
       asymptomatic transmission of a virus with only 166   
       Canadians not in Long-Term-Care dying up to Nov. 15,   
       2020; a Population Fatality Rate for Canadians not in   
       Long-Term-Care of a mere 0.00044%, 1 in 230,000.   
       118. Government-mandated COVID-Mitigation restrictions   
       on civil rights imposed under such delusions are   
       unconstitutionally per incuriam. Restrictions on civil   
       liberties are not warranted for a COVID threat if they   
       are not warranted for the tenfold deadlier Flu threat.   
       The restrictions are focused on the long-shots with a   
       0.00044% (1/230,000) chance of death and not on those   
       shorter shots in Long-Term-Care with 10,871/38M = 0.03%   
       (1/3,300). A third of the Flu's 1/1000.   
      
   JCT: Notice she doesn't mention the 3.4% Apple to the 0.1%   
   Orange. Notice how she ducked mentioning the Apple-Orange   
   Comparison!   
      
   J: [3] The Statement of Claim makes extensive references to   
   statistics comparing COVID-19 mortality rates to those of   
   the flu, news reports and statements and reports made by the   
   World Health Organization, Dr. Fauci, and the American   
   Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC].   
      
   [4] The Plaintiff alleges that there has been a "cover up"   
   because actual deaths from COVID19 do not match the   
   exaggerated expected death rate, such that the Government   
   has "fudged the statistical Cases and Fatalities data". The   
   pleading refers to alleged changes by the CDC to its death   
   certificate guidelines, setting PCR test kits with   
   sensitivity cycles set too high in order to generate massive   
   false positives and an effort by mainstream media to   
   discredit HydroxyChloroQuine HCQ as a treatment alternative   
   (as opposed to a "Bill Gates-funded Oxford Recovery HCQ test   
   protocol that "was really murder on his patients"), which   
   suppression of hopeful alternatives suggests "deliberate   
   malevolence:.   
      
   [5] The Plaintiff alleges that there has been "a general   
   slaughter of unorthodox viewpoints on the internet", with   
   various social media platforms like YouTube, Twitter and   
   Facebook having instituted "draconian censorship policies".   
   He pleads:   
       111. With the Apple-Orange amplification of the COVID   
       threat by a hundredfold is exposed, Dr. Hodkinson, Dr.   
       Bhakdi and many other doctors protesting the hoax are   
       proven right and have been defamed by Big Brother at AP   
       and Facebook. Too many doctors have avowed in public   
       that COVID is a tame virus and the numbers back them up   
       to expose the COVID 19 scamdemic.   
      
   [6] Under the heading "Lockdown Gain Does Not Justify   
   Lockdown Pain", the Plaintiff pleads:   
       103. COVID-Mitigation restrictions include lockdowns &   
       curfews, quarantines, mandatory masks, mandatory social   
       distancing, mandatory vaccine, mandatory immunity card   
       for public services. The debilitating effects of   
       lockdowns on prisoners is well-documented even if the   
       effects of home arrests are less so. Lockdowns have been   
       a Canadian disaster regularly detailed in the news. It   
       is hoped it should not take much to convince the court   
       that suicides, murders, abuses, addictions, truancy,   
       have all gone up under lockdown. Personal loss suffered   
       not visiting relatives, time lost by line-ups at stores,   
       higher prices to pay for protection measures, stress   
       from the distress shown by many. Neighbours snitching on   
       neighbours, friendships breaking over accusations of   
       deniers putting alarmists at risk from the invisible   
       plague by not obeying preventative measures seriously.   
      
   [7] With respect to the Plaintiff's alleged Charter   
   breaches, paragraph 104 of the Statement of Claim pleads:   
       Such restrictions on civil liberties to mitigate a sham-   
       virus are an arbitrary, grossly disproportional,   
       conscience-shocking violation of the Charter Section 2   
       right to freedom of peaceful assembly and association is   
       gone, s.6 right to mobility, s.7 right to life, liberty   
       and security, s.8 right to be secure against   
       unreasonable search or seizure, s.9 right to not to be   
       arbitrarily detained or imprisoned, s.12 right to not be   
       subjected to any cruel or unusual treatment or   
       punishment, not in accordance with the principles of   
       fundamental justice.   
      
   [8] The Statement of Claim refers to the Ontario   
   government's declaration of a provincial emergency and a   
   "Stay-at-Home Order" issued under the provincial Emergency   
   Management and Civil Protection Act and a statement made by   
   Prime Minister Trudeau describing the requirements for   
   international travelers arriving by air to produce a   
   negative COVID-19 test before entering Canada, for all   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)