Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    can.legal    |    Debating Canuck legal system quirks    |    10,932 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 10,735 of 10,932    |
|    John KingofthePaupers Turmel to All    |
|    TURMEL: Crown drops Pilon traffic charge    |
|    09 Sep 22 20:06:39    |
      From: johnturmel@gmail.com              TURMEL: Crown drops Pilon traffic charge, house seizure, indictment to summary       conviction              JCT: Gisele Pilon was the second medpot case where the Crown       is going after the grower's home. She had a great       constitutional motion.              Paragraph 170 of the Hitzig decision said after the       resurrected the prohibition without Parliament that "those       who establish medical need are simply exempt.              So Gisele submitted her doctor's medical document in June       and when Health Canada took their time processing her       permit, she started and got busted 6 months later.              Then she filed a Federal Court Statement of Claim for       damages due to delay and for an interim exemption pending       delivery of her permit. Health Canada hopped to it and got       her permit to her in 6 days to mooten her motion for interim       remedy.              But the Crown then decided to charge her with Possession for       the Purpose of Trafficking (with no evidence of trafficking)       and file an application to seize her home.              They were going to have her 5-day trial before hearing her       constitutional motion to declare the law invalid to avoid       taking too long due to the Jordan decision. So she was       expected her to waste resources fighting the charge before       the validity of the charge was established so the Jordan       clock wouldn't run out. So she filed a motion to waive the       protection of the Jordan decision and have the validity of       the charge established before spending resources on defence.              So the Crown offered her a sweet deal. Before Madame Justice       Charbonneau, they said they would drop the trafficking       charge and the application to seize the house. Good news.       But when Gisele said that she'd want to have a discharge       with no criminal record since there would have been no       charge but for Health Canada's dereliction of duty. The       Crown told the judge that she couldn't grant a discharge in       a trial by indictment, only a summary conviction charge. So       the judge reduced the charge to a summary conviction so       she'll be able to grant a discharge! The Crown will still       ask for 3 months house arrest.              On Sep 22, Gisele has to suhmit the medical information that       convinced her doctor to sign her medical document, probably       so the judge has good reason to grant the discharge. Then       the judge will later hand down her decision.              So it looks like Gisele will have spent 2 years in the       courts due to Health Canada taking 7 months to process her       permit and the Crown wanting to punish her for starting       without waiting!              So we'll see. But it looks good. I find it hard to believe       that the judge is going to punish her when they wouldn't       even be there but for Health Canada's incompetence.              She'll point out that in 2013, Dr. Stephane Lessard,       Controlled Substances and Tobacco Directorate, told Federal       Court Justice Roy that Under the MMAR, processing an       application to produce marijuana was "done in under 4       weeks."              Under the Cannabis Act & Regulations, it took up to 11       months for Igor Mozajko. Gisele's had taken 7 months before       her Federal Court Statement of Claim prompted them to       quickly issue it to mooten my motion for interim exemption       pending delivery. Like the previous other 80 movers got       hop-to-it permits to mooten their motions.              Who wants to bet that Justice Charbonneau gives her a       criminal record?              The sweet deal actually breaks my heart because I wanted       her to argue that the exemption started when she got her       permit, not when Health Canada issued it.              I only have one more medpot case going on in criminal court,       a big one in Montreal today where they seized a whole bunch       of houses and cars. A 28-person bust and my guy isn't paying       a lawyer as the Crown sought 9 more months to investigate.       My guy asked to get to use his truck as he was allowed to       keep living in his house. They can always seize them after       it's over. The judge will decide whether he can have his car       back while the Crown gets more time to investigate.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca