Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    can.legal    |    Debating Canuck legal system quirks    |    10,932 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 10,793 of 10,932    |
|    John KingofthePaupers Turmel to All    |
|    TURMEL: Appeal Fothergill bar on Turmel     |
|    10 Dec 22 08:51:33    |
      From: johnturmel@gmail.com              TURMEL: Appeal Fothergill bar on Turmel in Federal Courts              JCT: On Nov 9 2022, Federal Court of Canada Justice       Fothergill granted the Crown's application to declare me a       vexatious litigant who should be restricted. Yesterday, Dec       9 2022 I filed my Notice of Appeal.       - Crown has 10 days to file a Notice of Appearance.       - Within 30 days, we must file an agreement as to contents       of the Appeal Book.       - In 30 days, file Appeal Book with grey cover       - In 30 days, file my Appellant's Memorandum       - In 30 days, Crown files Respondent's Memorandum       - In 20 days, file Requisition for hearing       - In 30 days, file Joint Book of Authorities burgundy cover               FCA No._________        FCC No: T-130-21               FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL              Between:        John Turmel        Appellant        Respondent        AND               Her Majesty The Queen        Respondent        Applicant               NOTICE OF APPEAL        Pursuant to Rule 337              TO THE RESPONDENT:       A LEGAL PROCEEDING HAS BEEN COMMENCED AGAINST YOU by the       appellant. The relief claimed by the appellant appears on       the following page.              THIS APPEAL will be heard by the Court at a time and place       to be fixed by the Judicial Administrator. Unless the Court       directs otherwise, the place of hearing will be as requested       by the appellant. The appellant requests that this appeal be       heard at Toronto.              IF YOU WISH TO OPPOSE THIS APPEAL, to receive notice of any       step in the appeal or to be served with any documents in the       appeal, you or a solicitor acting for you must prepare a       notice of appearance in Form 341 prescribed by the Federal       Courts Rules and serve it on the appellants solicitor, or       where the appellant is self-represented, on the appellant,       WITHIN 10 DAYS of being served with this notice of appeal.       IF YOU INTEND TO SEEK A DIFFERENT DISPOSITION of the order       appealed from, you must serve and file a notice of cross-       appeal in Form 341 prescribed by the Federal Courts Rules       instead of serving and filing a notice of appearance.              Copies of the Federal Courts Rules information concerning       the local offices of the Court and other necessary       information may be obtained on request to the Administrator       of this Court at Ottawa (telephone 613-992-4238) or at any       local office.              IF YOU FAIL TO OPPOSE THIS APPEAL, JUDGMENT MAY BE GIVEN IN       YOUR ABSENCE AND WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE TO YOU.              Date: Dec 9 2922                     Issued by:________________________________       (Registry Officer)              TO: Attorney General for Canada       Attn: Jon Bricker               APPEAL              1. THE APPELLANT APPEALS to the Federal Court of Appeal from       the Nov 9 2022 decision Federal Court Justice Fothergill who       wrote:        [3] Mr. Turmel has instituted numerous meritless and        repetitive proceedings before this Court, the Federal        Court of Appeal, the Ontario Courts, and the Supreme        Court of Canada. He has brought proceedings for improper        purposes, frequently sought to re-litigate matters        decided previously, made scandalous allegations against        members of the courts and other parties, refused to        follow the Federal Courts Rules, and failed to pay costs        orders.        [4] Despite having no qualifications or apparent ability        to practice law, Mr. Turmel has developed litigation kits        comprising templates for court documents, and has recruited        others to "flood the courts" with these documents.        [5] Mr. Turmel.. continued to express contempt for the        judiciary, maintaining that any judge who disagrees with        him is simply wrong.        [6] Mr. Turmel does not object to the imposition of a        leave requirement before commencing further proceedings        in this Court. He says he is unlikely to develop further        litigation "kits" unless the government imposes new        vaccination mandates.        [7] For the reasons that follow, Mr. Turmel is declared        to be a vexatious litigant. He must pay all outstanding        costs awards issued by this Court, and obtain leave        before instituting or continuing any litigation in this        Court. He is also prohibited from aiding or abetting        others to initiate proceedings in this Court.        II. Background        [8] According to the affidavit evidence submitted by the        AGC, Mr. Turmel has instituted at least 67 court        proceedings since 1980.... The proceedings have        concerned a wide range of legal issues, and have been        almost entirely unsuccessful.        [9] Mr. Turmel's proceedings have been dismissed as        failing to disclose reasonable causes of action, as        wholly unsupported by evidence, as attempts to re-        litigate matters previously decided, or as otherwise        frivolous and vexatious and abuses of process.        A. Proceedings Commenced by Mr. Turmel        [10] Mr. Turmel's numerous legal proceedings may be        divided into the following categories.        (1) Banking Proceedings        [11] In 1981, Mr. Turmel filed an unsuccessful        application in this Court for an order that the Bank of        Canada cease and desist the "genocidal practice of        interest" (T-896-81). Both the FCA (A-136-81) and the        SCC (17314) dismissed Mr. Turmel's attempts to appeal.              2. No judge accepted that foreclosing on farmers who fail to       pay back 11 when banks only printed 10 was a physical       impossibility resulting in genocide of the poor. And since I       use math to determine fairness, judges who determine       fairness by "trial and error" must be wrong to disagree.              3. The Court continued:        [12] In 1982, the County Court of Ontario allowed an        action by the Toronto Dominion Bank against Mr. Turmel,        and granted judgment in the amount of $2,813.19. After        unsuccessfully appealing to the Ontario Court of Appeal        [ONCA], Mr. Turmel also unsuccessfully sought leave to        appeal to the SCC based on the assertion that the        interest charged by banks violates natural, biblical or        criminal laws (18329).              4. And then published an Anti-Foreclosure Stiff-The=Bank kit       showing others how to stall their evictions by arguing the same.              5. The Court continued:        (2) Elections Proceedings        [13] Mr. Turmel is a perennial candidate in municipal,              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca