85d43648   
   XPost: soc.men, can.politics, alt.child-support   
      
   On Fri, 3 Jul 2009 18:14:31 -0700 (PDT), Meldon   
    wrote:   
      
   >On Jul 3, 8:45 pm, Anonymous  wrote:   
   >> deadbeat dad has served reply for not paying support   
   >   
   >Silly rabbits can’t make a cogent argument without manufacturing false   
   >evidence using pre-packaged law as a guide. That’s what you get for   
   >bad intent.   
   >   
   >It was really quite an experience. There is a thrill I’ve never   
   >experienced and it is very empowering. Truth gives strength because   
   >that’s the right side of the law. My strength and her weakness is   
   >truth.   
   >   
   >What a silly move and such a fitting end to a tragic situation. Forget   
   >all the other stuff. The old crap that was by now 10 years old and   
   >seems so irrelevant. With her sworn false affidavit, she hung herself   
   >and her house of fraud, if I did my job right, must fall.   
   >   
   >The argument begins and ends with the person’s moral character. If you   
   >can show their blatant disregard for the truth and thereby the law,   
   >there can be no court who would undertake the suggestion that such an   
   >individual is a fit parent no matter how many diversions they can   
   >think of. It would be unusual for a court to support her bid to hold   
   >and consolidate full-custody under such a blatant act. They would   
   >otherwise be placing full parental authority in the hands of a person   
   >who has no actual understanding of the law and what it stands for.   
   >   
   >Hire all the lawyers you want now. It won’t matter. I shouldn’t need   
   >representation because when the argument becomes too twisted to   
   >answer, I’ll just pull out the false affidavit which I’ll likely   
   >frame.   
   >   
   Plently of liars and fools are parents, no license or edumecation   
   required and the courts are under no obligation to decide on a persons   
   morals (within reason). (heh, kinda sounds like an empty case, shame   
   the judge is willing to accommodate a miscarriage of justice).   
      
   Haven't been around to follow the case, (my condolences for the set   
   back).   
      
   Instead of character assassination (I know, your concerns were in the   
   interests of the child) I'd have gone for the shared parenting model   
   and get her back to work and in a real job (even if it means paying   
   for her education).   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)