14f3d2d0   
   XPost: soc.men, can.politics, alt.child-support   
   From: No.one@home.org   
      
   "Gloria Fong"  wrote in message   
   news:8a0c9bb1-65c0-4f2e-a38c-1e54568d1701@x5g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...   
   On Jul 3, 11:59 pm, Anonymous  wrote:   
   > he is deadbeat dad who owes over $300K in child support   
   > kids don't have food but meldon's fridge has beer   
      
   Wouldn’t a larger amount of arrears suggest a greater offence to the   
   payor?   
   ---------------------------   
   No, it would not.  It just means that there is a sizable sum to pay off.   
      
   Most likely, the creation of such a large amount came in the form of fees,   
   penalties and interest to an otherwise sizable sum created by the court for   
   non-child support amounts.  Many times marital debt, insurance payments,   
   attorneys fees and other non-C$ sums are used to create such debt for the   
   purpose of punishing the defendant for getting uppity with the court for   
   such things as.. sticking to the truth; having verifiable factual evidence;   
   witnesses to verify their facts; able to rebut opposing counsel; exposing   
   lies presented as fact to the court; etc..   
      
   Most "Family Court" judges have an agenda and often times they know the   
   opposing attorneys very, very well.  If a plaintiff is Pro-se before the   
   court, such tactics are commonly used to keep the Pro-se litigate from   
   presenting his/her evidence and showing to the world that the court is a   
   sham.  Most courts detest Pro-se litigates.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)