home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   can.legal      Debating Canuck legal system quirks      10,932 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 9,027 of 10,932   
   Dusty to Dusty   
   Re: meldon pretends he is hero of story    
   04 Jul 09 13:09:17   
   
   e6f8f924   
   XPost: soc.men, can.politics, alt.child-support   
   From: No.one@home.org   
      
   "Meldon"  wrote in message   
   news:15f2cf7c-c5d4-4aa7-93de-6f6c4f104e2b@b15g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...   
      
      
   Dusty wrote:   
   > "Gloria Fong"  wrote in message   
   > news:8a0c9bb1-65c0-4f2e-a38c-1e54568d1701@x5g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...   
   > On Jul 3, 11:59 pm, Anonymous  wrote:   
   > > he is deadbeat dad who owes over $300K in child support   
   > > kids don't have food but meldon's fridge has beer   
   >   
   > Wouldn�t a larger amount of arrears suggest a greater offence to the   
   > payor?   
   > ---------------------------   
   > No, it would not.  It just means that there is a sizable sum to pay off.   
   >   
   > Most likely, the creation of such a large amount came in the form of fees,   
   > penalties and interest to an otherwise sizable sum created by the court   
   > for   
   > non-child support amounts.  Many times marital debt, insurance payments,   
   > attorneys fees and other non-C$ sums are used to create such debt for the   
   > purpose of punishing the defendant for getting uppity with the court for   
   > such things as.. sticking to the truth; having verifiable factual   
   > evidence;   
   > witnesses to verify their facts; able to rebut opposing counsel; exposing   
   > lies presented as fact to the court; etc..   
   >   
   > Most "Family Court" judges have an agenda and often times they know the   
   > opposing attorneys very, very well.  If a plaintiff is Pro-se before the   
   > court, such tactics are commonly used to keep the Pro-se litigate from   
   > presenting his/her evidence and showing to the world that the court is a   
   > sham.  Most courts detest Pro-se litigates.   
      
   Abuse of the law does not mean the law is inherently unjust. It can be   
   just, insofar as it is presented with truth. In the eyes of the   
   unjust, truth is an enemy to be destroyed but this would destroy the   
   grail (and then the family) and then the law and then society.   
      
   I tell you now, you must trust what is sound and just and true and the   
   law is these things.   
   ---------------------------   
   That's all well and good, but when the law is administrated by the corrupt,   
   then the law is corrupt as well.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca