160d5f52
XPost: alt.suicide.holiday, alt.usenet.kooks
From: undertow@news.vrx.net
In article ,
Requiscant In Pace wrote:
>On Jul 24, 1:54 pm, under...@news.vrx.net (Drowning Not Waving
>Goodbye) wrote:
>> In article <30961h.dho.1...@news.alt.net>,
>> Emo Haircut wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> >Emo Haircut wrote:
>> >> Today Pat has indicated he want to file a lawsuit, and has said he's
>> >> going to serve me papers.
>>
>> >> Let's keep track of how many days pass until that happens. Today, Apr
>> >> 26 2009, Julian date 2454948, will be day "0".
>>
>> >> Won't this be fun??
>>
>> >24 July 2009
>>
>> >It's now been 88 days (almost 3 months) since Patrick Michael Sullivan
>> >threatened me with a lawsuit. It's been less than one day since he's
>> >spewed similar threats to other newsgroup posters.
>>
>> here's why.
>>
>> To file a claim in CDN courts there are costs involved.
>> The clerks have their hands out for and immediate $300+ at the wicket.
>> This is the first line of defence to weed out claims deemed frivolous or
>> vexatious.
>>
>> You will need correct information about who you are suing to properly
>> prepare and serve your claim, and to enforce a judgment. To acquire
>> that information costs could run as high as another $10 to $500
>> depending on how easy it is to harvest the info. It has to be
>> accurate or you have to refile the original paperwork which
>> further ramps up the bill.
>>
>> You may hire the help of a paralegal organization to do the legwork for
>> you and that of course could add another $1,500 to the dent in the wallet.
>>
>> Once completely sure, back to the wicket you go.
>> (travel expense to and from)
>>
>> The clerk gals at the wicket thenhave their hands out for another:
>> (contribution)
>> Filing of a claim by an infrequent claimant $75
>> Filing a notice of motion served on another party, a notice of motion
>> without notice or a notice of motion for a consent order (except a notice
>> of motion under the Wages Act) $40
>> Fixing of a date for trial by an infrequent claimant $100
>>
>> off to the sherrif we go: (for service)
>> For up to three attempts, whether or not successful, to serve a document,
>> for each person to be served costs $100.00
>>
>> I could go on. The costs above detail actions required to simply
>> *launch* [the boat] and clearly in the case at hand....
>>
>> paddles being an unemployed nutjob .... you can rest assured it'll
>> be quite some tme before the papers reach your hand.
>>
>> hth
>>
>> --
>> !Dr. Tom Evans Master of Puppets
>> DENSA Life Achievement ø Am I the only one in here with half a brain?
~~~~~~restart discussion~~~~
RIP
>Let me run this past you, Tom.
>
>Patrick claims to be able to file a case against ASHer's in the
>states. I think he is under the idea he can simply file a case here
>in Kentucky where I live, or in the states where Emo and River live.
>So, how does that work exactly?
>If you know... If not, that's okay too.
This could take a while. Light up as smoke, grab a bowl of cheezies, let
Fido out for a pee and tuck the kids in with a story from Aesop's Fables.
ok - ready?
Ask yourself why Patrick Michael Sullivan [felon] wants to launch
the [hollow threat] proposed kooksuit in a foreign country?
[since he's Canadian]
Answer. In our Canadian courts he'd lose.
One look at his record and outstanding unpaid judgement would
tip *any* court justice off to his motivation behind the suit.
so:
The first line of defense is that Paddles is smoke and mirrors.
[talk] based on months and months of drumming an empty barrel.
Translated, it isn't going to happen [period]
The *second* first line of defence is existing fact.
From what I've witnessed in *all* these discussions,
the [empty barrel hollow threat] kooksuit is based
primarily on already "existing" public knowledge.
(You haven't presented anything we haven't already seen.)
His name is everywhere. What he has done is everywhere.
His criminal record is everywhere. Knowledge that he is
a participant or instigator in ongoing r/l and internet
harrassment and libel is everywhere.
What he is doing is clearly contrary to conditions
ordered in his original judgement.
[he is prohibited from engaging in online libel or harrassment]
Then, Patrick Sullivan is a convicted felon in Canada.
As such, the justice isn't going to spend more than two
minutes deciding that what he claims is either a complete
waste of court time [frivolous] or a lie [vexatious].
You have no prior judgements or criminal record based of
libel and harrassment - he has both.
Assuming he did have all his ducks in a row, which he doesn't,
he's thinking he'd have a better chance in a district court
in the US. (Kentucky)
He has to travel all the way down there, or hire a lawyer
all the way down there to "get her done" as per the dictates
and requirements of the courts in any given county or
jurisdiction.
Of course, he'd best have his act togehter before trying to enter the
US since if he plans to go there in person, the folks at the border
want ID, meaning as soon as he presents it they run the name and
see he's a convicted felon and naturally won't be allowed entry.
So, he needs a lawyer but has no money to retain one.
A major bottleneck. Since the kooksuit won't float it
would a complete waste of money to proceed.
Courts aren't stupid, Patrick Michael Sullivan is.
Do not give this kook another minute of your time other
than continuing to hammer his posts with the facts
since the rest of us watching get great pleasure from
watchng him continually make a moar complete and utter
ass of himself daily.
Now. Take ten deep breaths and fart on an 8x10 inch glossy of
his image. If you don't have his real image, this one fits like
a glove.
http://patrick-michael-sullivan.blogspot.com/
>By the way, I've tried to return emails to you a couple of times and
>they bounce. What's up with that?
take out the word "news" in the addie.
looking forward to some great email exchanges my friend.
!dr
--
!Dr. Tom Evans Master of Puppets
DENSA Life Achievement ø Am I the only one in here with half a brain?
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
