Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    can.legal    |    Debating Canuck legal system quirks    |    10,932 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 9,153 of 10,932    |
|    abc to All    |
|    Rethinking Canada's pension problem    |
|    16 Aug 09 08:32:39    |
      XPost: can.general, can.jobs, can.politics       From: abc@123.cl              Rethinking Canada's pension problem              Getting Real              August 16, 2009              Alberta MP Ted Menzies is travelling the country getting feedback from       citizens and experts on pension reform. He does not have his own       pension.              Alberta MP Ted Menzies is travelling the country getting feedback from       citizens and experts on pension reform. He does not have his own       pension.       Photograph by: Canwest News Service , Canwest News Service              Pensions have been centre stage in many of the dramas that played out       in the recession, from retirement portfolios wiped out in the stock       market crash to the bankruptcies of high-profile corporations like       Nortel Networks Corp. and AbitibiBowater Inc., which have left massive       underfunded pension liabilities in their wake. No one was immune, not       even blue-chip funds like the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board.              Enter Ted Menzies. The Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of       Finance has become the government’s face of pension reform. Since       March, Mr. Menzies has been criss-crossing the country getting feedback       from regular Canadians and experts alike. He is also chairing an intra       -provincial steering committee examining Canada’s national retirement       income system. It will be tabled at the finance ministers meeting in       December.              “The solvency issue in the major pension funds was a big wake-up call       to Canadians,” says Mr. Menzies, referring to multi-billion-dollar       losses at the Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec and Ontario       Teachers’ Pension Plan.              While the losses grabbed the government’s attention, there is a bigger       issue to be addressed: The majority of Canadians do not have a pension       plan despite the fact we are living longer.              A 2007 report by consulting firm Towers Perrin, found the private       sector workforce grew by 26% in Canada between 1992 and 2005, but       overall pension coverage fell from 49% to 42%. It’s the perfect storm       for a pension crisis.              “We all have examples of people who sold their businesses thinking they       had a lot to retire on, but discovered they didn’t,” says Mr. Menzies.              The Conservative MP from Alberta ought to know. A former self-employed       farmer, Mr. Menzies doesn’t have a pension plan of his own. “I have       been self-employed for 35 years, and for many years I invested in farm       land rather than RRSPs... And I haven’t been a politician long enough       to have a pension plan,” he says.              Mr. Menzies says the goal of the steering committee is to decide       whether or not Canada needs a better system: “What can we do to       encourage more people to save and what else is needed to supplement the       Canada Pension Plan?”              Herewith, three possible fixes being considered for Canadians:              The Government Solution              One strong proposal is a second-tier fund that would sit on top of the       Canada Pension Plan. Rather than a defined-benefit (DB) plan, which       guarantees a certain pension amount, the model being floated is a       defined-contribution (DC) plan or some hybrid between DB and DC plans,       in which the employer and employees share the funding risk. Many       questions still need to be answered. For example, should the self-       employed be able to opt in? Should the plan be voluntary or mandatory?       And who would manage the fund?              One downside of a broad-based DC plan means anyone planning to retire       in a year of poor market returns would see a reduction in payout. “It       won’t give you real security,” says David Service of Towers Perrin.              The private sector is also raising alarms over an intra-provincial       government-run fund: “It would create a monopoly in the system,” says       Frank Swedlove, president of the Canadian Life and Health Insurance       Association.              The Private-Sector Solution              The insurance sector is floating its own multi-group DC plan. They are       calling for regulatory changes that would allow them to lump small and       mid-size companies together under one plan to achieve economies of       scale. The industry plan is a variation on the theme the government is       proposing, but insurance firms would be the administrator.              Life insurance companies already administer the majority of DC plans in       Canada and they “want to be part of the action,” says Mr. Service.              The upside of their proposal is that the industry already has the       administration infrastructure. The downside is that the industry hasn’t       proved it can offer an optimal service. It currently costs 50-70 basis       points more to administer a DC plan than a large DB plan, according to       Towers Perrin.              Analysts also question whether the private sector would manage       investments in the best interests of plan members. DC plan members need       a tremendous amount of financial knowledge in general and advice on       investing. “The current outcomes for DC plan members suggests that       these needs are not being met by industry offerings,” says James       Pierlot of Towers Perrin.              The Uber-Fund Solution              Two of Canada’s largest funds — Ontario Teachers’ Pension Fund and       OMERS — want to offer their services to smaller pension funds. The       blue-chip funds think they can do it better, and can offer economies of       scale. Not only would this reduce administration costs, but it opens up       new investing opportunities for smaller funds which can’t normally       access alternative asset classes such as infrastructure, private equity       and real estate.              This model, while beneficial for some, does not address the issue of       overall coverage for Canadians. Ian Markham of Watson Wyatt says it       will not increase the number of companies in the private sector willing       to have some kind of a pension plan.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca