ays.soc.not.net   
   1e2d99a5   
   XPost: soc.men, can.politics, bc.politics   
   XPost: alt.abortion   
   From: Conspiracy........@the..black..hole..wheresocilaistsplays.soc.not.net   
      
   "Moderator"  wrote in message   
   news:0b923151-4d72-43be-9ea8-7d35dfba29b0@q35g2000vbi.googlegroups.com...   
   On Aug 23, 5:59 pm, "Tentacles of death......the Socialist Conspiracy"   
      
   wrote:   
   > "Moderator"  wrote in message   
   >   
   > news:481ce01c-dc10-4515-af66-9b8d75a67b9f@l35g2000vba.googlegroups.com...   
   > On Aug 23, 3:45 pm, "Tentacles of death......the Socialist Conspiracy"   
   >  Conspiracy........@the..black..hole..wheresocilaistsplays.soc.not.net>   
   > wrote:   
   >   
   > > "Moderator"  wrote in message   
   >   
   > >news:dbb97aec-54dd-40b9-b595-a8103a2001ea@r27g2000vbn.googlegroups.com...   
   >   
   > > >I’m holding the po$ter accountable for violating the law$ of Briti$h   
   > > >Columbia.   
   >   
   > > If "Heidi Graw" based her statements on her opinions which she truly   
   > > beleived them true, then you will not have a case whatsoever, ..   
   >   
   > Save it for the commission.   
   >   
   > Would you like the Supreme Court of BC caselaw on this and what the courts   
   > said..   
      
   >You're going to help me?   
      
   No you got it wrong. Sorry   
      
   >That would be interesting indeed but no   
   >thanks. Send them to Heiftybag. If Heifty had an IQ=10, your defence   
   >might work. The poster is screwed. The only hope is to work the inside   
   >and somehow convince the commission to reject the case then there's no   
   >need for a desperate defence.   
      
   The Commission has to stay within the laws of Canada and BC. If you filed   
   with the HRC then "Heidi Graw" could have it moved to the "Supreme Court of   
   BC", by filing to the BC courts, where her pleadings could have the case   
   dismissed...   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)