34966beb   
   XPost: soc.men, can.politics, uk.politics.misc   
   From: klunk@theothershoo.org   
      
   "Moderator"  wrote in message   
   news:0321d95d-b22b-46ed-b0f0-277539f5c065@r36g2000vbn.googlegroups.com...   
   > On Aug 29, 5:35 pm, "klunk"  wrote:   
   >> "Moderator"  wrote in message   
   >>   
   >> news:01bacccf-a11f-4147-9ec8-fd132c187c74@s6g2000vbp.googlegroups.com...   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> > klunk wrote:   
   >> >> "Moderator"  wrote in message   
   >> >>news:dbde2b5b-4d59-4a66-a368-e2c839d02add@j9g2000vbp.googlegroups.com...   
   >> >> > On Aug 29, 3:20 am, "klunk"  wrote:   
   >> >> >> "Moderator"  wrote in message   
   >>   
   >> >> >>news:4b61d801-ba35-4c49-b26c-b8f6010b35f5@f33g2000vbm.go   
   glegroups.com...   
   >>   
   >> >> >> > On Aug 28, 9:06 pm, "klunk"  wrote:   
   >> >> >> >> "Moderator"  wrote in message   
   >>   
   >> >> >> >>news:45f70e7e-8d03-4e96-a62a-0be981d1a589@g1g2000vbr.   
   ooglegroups.com...   
   >>   
   >> >> >> >> > klunk wrote:   
   >> >> >> >> >> "Moderator"  wrote in message   
   >> >> >> >> >>news:65a59e9e-b7f9-4ff0-8cfc-8e49e97bc246@g1g2000v   
   r.googlegroups.com...   
   >> >> >> >> >> > On Aug 26, 10:29 pm, "klunk"    
   >> >> >> >> >> > wrote:   
   >> >> >> >> >> >> "Meldon"  wrote in message   
   >>   
   >> >> >> >> >> >>news:2a0d2309-bfb8-48a9-bfa2-405bd4fea318@e34g2   
   00vbm.googlegroups.com...   
   >>   
   >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Aug 25, 3:24 am, "gaz"  wrote:   
   >> >> >> >> >> >> >> klunk wrote:   
   >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > "Moderator"  wrote in message   
   >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >news:b49d93c0-a81b-4dc8-baf9-fa15c042b746@   
   30g2000vbr.googlegroups.com...   
   >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I Filed my Reverse Discrimination Case   
   >>   
   >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > hmmmm.... interesting how the word "reverse" loads   
   >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > your   
   >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > claim   
   >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > with   
   >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > additional meaning...   
   >>   
   >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Maybe because to some, the term 'reverse' is a good   
   >> >> >> >> >> >> >> thing.   
   >>   
   >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Gaz   
   >>   
   >> >> >> >> >> >> > I think a great many people are catchng on and are   
   >> >> >> >> >> >> > beginning   
   >> >> >> >> >> >> > to   
   >> >> >> >> >> >> > fighting back.   
   >>   
   >> >> >> >> >> >> ...so.... are you fighting for or against   
   >> >> >> >> >> >> discrimination....?....   
   >>   
   >> >> >> >> >> > I'm fighting for my own justice. How would you define that?   
   >>   
   >> >> >> >> >> does your justice differ from the justice everyone else   
   >> >> >> >> >> has...?...   
   >>   
   >> >> >> >> > It should probably be the same but that concept of justice has   
   >> >> >> >> > been   
   >> >> >> >> > replaced with something different. In this case, justice is   
   >> >> >> >> > something   
   >> >> >> >> > the individual has to fight for and that's what I'm doing.   
   >>   
   >> >> >> >> if "justice has been replaced with something different", then   
   >> >> >> >> you're   
   >> >> >> >> not   
   >> >> >> >> fighting for justice... you're fighting for something else...   
   >> >> >> >> and   
   >> >> >> >> in   
   >> >> >> >> all   
   >> >> >> >> cases, justice is something that every individual has to fight   
   >> >> >> >> for..   
   >>   
   >> >> >> > Its an acceptable position. I may be fighting for remedy and I   
   >> >> >> > could   
   >> >> >> > argue it is just and t is relative.   
   >>   
   >> >> >> > I can also ask, how can we be certain that reality is uncertain?   
   >> >> >> > We   
   >> >> >> > can argue these circular arguments all you want. At some point a   
   >> >> >> > likelihood of certainty must be accepted and I am arguing what I   
   >> >> >> > have   
   >> >> >> > experienced is certainly unjust and I'm fighting the injustice   
   >> >> >> > regardless of the outcome or the inherant uncertainty.   
   >>   
   >> >> >> if you are fighting for a remedy and to correct an injustice...   
   >> >> >> then   
   >> >> >> you   
   >> >> >> are   
   >> >> >> fighting for justice..   
   >> >> >> as far as the rest of your post is concerned.... well... it was   
   >> >> >> just   
   >> >> >> gibberish... what's with all this other philosophical crap about   
   >> >> >> the   
   >> >> >> veracity of reality...?....   
   >>   
   >> >> >> if you have a case, then state it man...   
   >> >> >> produce evidence...   
   >> >> >> seek a ruling by a qualified representative   
   >> >> >> and move on with your life....   
   >>   
   >> >> >> ....cause the amount of dough you're asking sounds inflated from   
   >> >> >> the   
   >> >> >> get-go... but... aside from a devaluing of the dollar figure based   
   >> >> >> upon   
   >> >> >> my   
   >> >> >> own dubious views of your claim... I'll say this... it's a pittance   
   >> >> >> you're   
   >> >> >> pissing away valuable energy on inevitably never seeing made   
   >> >> >> manifest   
   >> >> >> in   
   >> >> >> this real reality where you have to pay bills and put food on the   
   >> >> >> table...   
   >> >> >> in the end... you're just going to end up feeling like you've taken   
   >> >> >> it   
   >> >> >> up   
   >> >> >> the end and you're going to end up at the end of your resources   
   >> >> >> hoping   
   >> >> >> the   
   >> >> >> nightmare ends....   
   >>   
   >> >> >> ...but.... good luck with your cause anyway.... :-)   
   >>   
   >> >> > I did not file a complaint because I thought it would be decided in   
   >> >> > my   
   >> >> > favor. I am doing what I believe to be just. You can be sure that I   
   >> >> > will be providing as much detail here as possible once the case has   
   >> >> > been decided and the same goes for my hearing at Family Court.   
   >>   
   >> >> ....so.... you prefer to dribble out dramatically highlighted vagaries   
   >> >> on   
   >> >> usenut as a means of enticing your audience....?...   
   >>   
   >> > Do you think I should detail both cases here and supply enough detail   
   >> > so that a decade of postings under a pseudonym can be linked to me   
   >> > personally before they are heard in court? That’s probably not a good   
   >> > idea but I guarantee I will provide many details once the process is   
   >> > complete. In the meantime I hope to provide encouragement to other   
   >> > fathers getting ripped off in family court and white anglo males being   
   >> > ripped off by politicians selling out their livelihood and their   
   >> > country.   
   >>   
   >> I think if truth and justice are on your side, then the more clear and   
   >> open   
   >> your story is, the greater the odds of achieving your goals... waiting   
   >> until   
   >> the process is complete suggests some discomfort with your version of   
   >> what   
   >> you consider to be truth... enough to be uncertain as to whether or not   
   >> you   
   >> can get support for your cause... otherwise, you would have no problem   
   >> establishing your case(s) in very clear detail....   
   >>   
   >> if truth and justice were on your side, you would welcome an opportunity   
   >> to   
   >> get your story out to the world...   
   >   
   > That doesn't make any sense but I guess we're used to that coming from   
   > you. I've placed the HRTO application online for your review in a   
   > members only area. http://private-legal.blogspot.com/   
      
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)