6d6c118d   
   XPost: aus.legal, misc.legal, uk.legal   
   From: no-one@myarl.co.uk   
      
   dotcom wrote:   
   > On Aug 30, 10:24 pm, "Norman Wells" wrote:   
   >> dotcom wrote:   
   >>> On Aug 30, 9:52 pm, "Norman Wells" wrote:   
   >>>> If your disrespect for the court is gross then of course   
   >>>> punishments exist for contempt of court under the Contempt of   
   >>>> Court Act 1981. These are entirely in the gift of the judge and at   
   >>>> his complete discretion. Otherwise, if you are found guilty, and   
   >>>> he feels you have been disrespectful, he of course has   
   >>>> considerable latitude over the penalties he can impose, and he   
   >>>> might be tempted to opt for the upper end rather than the lower.   
   >>   
   >>>> Moreover, he doesn't have to justify what he does either to you or   
   >>>> anyone else.   
   >>   
   >>>> As I said, it's up to you how you behave in court, but it's best to   
   >>>> conform   
   >>   
   >>> Norman, Norman , Norman thats just plain silly. If you think   
   >>> about what you just said, then   
   >>> a magistrate could ask you to lick his backside and you would have   
   >>> to do it.   
   >>> Again are there any lawyers out there that really know what the law   
   >>> is in this respect?   
   >>   
   >> I've told you the law. I've even given you the means to look it up   
   >> yourself.   
   >>   
   >> Why don't you avail yourself of this heaven-sent opportunuity   
      
      
   > You're obviously English Norman. and while we may not be a republic   
   > yet I do believe we have moved on a bit from English law.   
      
   Probably not, actually. I doubt if you're capable.   
      
   However, if you post in the uk.legal newsgroup you must expect to receive   
   replies based on UK law. After all, what do we in the civilised world know   
   or care what happens in the colonies?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|