XPost: aus.legal, misc.legal, uk.legal   
   From: reality@check.it   
      
   "Kent Wills"  wrote in message   
   news:dk43d5tngqn98b2matnl7s9sr5gf65n7v1@4ax.com...   
   > On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 09:51:32 -0600, "¦ Reality Check© ¦"   
   >  wrote:   
   >   
   > [...]   
   >   
   >>>>>     Oddly enough, Richard is right.  When one is outside, the   
   >>>>>expectation of privacy is diminished a great deal.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>No, he's not. "Public Domain" refers to something completely   
   >>>>different, not a person being outside and then being photographed.   
   >>>   
   >>>     If you wish to argue semantics, then you would be correct.   
   >>   
   >>You're an ignoramus, Kunt.   
   >   
   >     Do you think when one is outside their expectation of privacy is   
   > the same as when they are inside?  Are you really that dumb?   
      
   Klueless Kent Wills doesn't know the difference between "public domain"   
   and the "expectation of privacy".   
      
   "outside" or "inside" is utterly irrelevant to either, you stammering   
   imbecile.   
      
   When you were "inside" your neighbors house, burglarizing their garage,   
   did you think you had an "expectation of privacy" to conduct your crimes?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)