XPost: aus.legal, misc.legal, uk.legal   
   From: compuelf@gmail.com   
      
   On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 10:01:09 -0600, "¦ Reality Check© ¦"   
    wrote:   
      
   >   
   >"Kent Wills"  wrote in message   
   >news:dk43d5tngqn98b2matnl7s9sr5gf65n7v1@4ax.com...   
   >> On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 09:51:32 -0600, "¦ Reality Check© ¦"   
   >>  wrote:   
   >>   
   >> [...]   
   >>   
   >>>>>>     Oddly enough, Richard is right.  When one is outside, the   
   >>>>>>expectation of privacy is diminished a great deal.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>No, he's not. "Public Domain" refers to something completely   
   >>>>>different, not a person being outside and then being photographed.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>     If you wish to argue semantics, then you would be correct.   
   >>>   
   >>>You're an ignoramus, Kunt.   
   >>   
   >>     Do you think when one is outside their expectation of privacy is   
   >> the same as when they are inside?  Are you really that dumb?   
   >   
   >Klueless Kent Wills doesn't know the difference between "public domain"   
   >and the "expectation of privacy".   
      
        Why do you lie?   
      
   >   
   >"outside" or "inside" is utterly irrelevant to either, you stammering   
   >imbecile.   
      
        Why do you lie?   
      
   >   
   >When you were "inside" your neighbors house, burglarizing their garage,   
   >did you think you had an "expectation of privacy" to conduct your crimes?   
   >   
      
        I've committed no such act. No amount of your lying will alter   
   this simple truth.   
      
   --   
   "Kent"   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)