82e43423   
   XPost: can.politics   
   From: none@invalid.null   
      
   "KingofthePaupers"  wrote in message   
   news:a6961246-15cd-4174-bb84-4443bdd48287@o30g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...   
   >   
   > JCT: After speaking to Rogers, they offered me 3 minutes but   
   > would not let me participate in the hour with the other   
   > candidates. I sent the following message:   
   >   
   > I'll be there tomorrow at 1pm ready to participate in debate with   
   > you. Don't make me have to spend my 3-minute comment talking   
   > about you when I'd rather be talking about my UNILETS program.   
   > Yours truly,  John Turmel   
   >   
   I live in the riding, UNILETS is not a campaign issue in fact it is proof   
   why you are not a good candidate. A MLA is to represent the interests of all   
   the constituents, not the candidates kook obsessions.   
      
   Turmel claims to be a "professional gamblers" losing 71 elections shows that   
   you are not a gambler, a pro gambler will know when to fold and walk away.   
   You are more like the losers at Casino Lac Leamy that lose their homes to   
   the slots.   
      
   You are claiming to want to represent us (Otawa West-Nepean) how long have   
   you lived in the riding? In the past year you have run in 5 elections;   
      
   March 5, 2009 Provincial by-election Haliburton-Kawartha Lakes-Brock   
   September 17, 2009 Provincial by-election St. Paul's   
   November 9, 2009 Federal by-election Hochelaga   
   February 4, 2010 Provincial by-election Toronto Centre   
   March 4, 2010 Provincial By-Election Ottawa West-Nepean   
      
   No fixed address is not what I want in my candidate. Nor do I want a urine   
   drinking putz (pee-pee power) as my candidate, it's a urinal John not a   
   drinking fountain!   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)