Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    can.legal    |    Debating Canuck legal system quirks    |    10,932 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 9,462 of 10,932    |
|    Greg Carr to All    |
|    Hell's Angel Groupie Judge Peter Leask A    |
|    14 Mar 10 00:30:14    |
      XPost: van.general, bc.general, bc.politics       XPost: can.politics, alt.true-crime, alt.harley       From: gregpcarr@yahoo.ca              Two Hells Angels members were handed short jail sentences Friday for       serious drug trafficking offences. The Crown immediately appealed.              B.C. Justice Peter Leask decided a number of mitigating factors would       reduce the sentences of Hells Angels members John Virgil Punko and       Randy Richard Potts, including Potts' chronic back pain and a       recurring abscess on his buttocks that causes him considerable pain       and discomfort.              The judge sentenced Potts to one year in jail, which was much less       than the 12 years requested by federal prosecutor Martha Devlin.              Punko, 43, was handed a 14-month sentence. The Crown had asked for 16       years.              The Crown immediately filed appeals in the B.C. Court of Appeal,       seeking to have the sentences increased.              During sentencing, Leask said both bikers were "pawns of police"       because they were low-level targets used to try to get to high-level       targets within Vancouver's East End chapter of the Hells Angels.              The bikers were charged in 2005 after a two-year, $10-million police       investigation code-named Project E-Pandora. A total of six Hells       Angels and 13 associates were charged.              Potts and Punko were the last to be prosecuted.              RCMP Insp. Gary Shinkaruk, the officer in charge of the investigation,       said there were obvious discrepancies between Friday's sentences and       the lengthy prison terms sought by the Crown.              "We certainly respect the position of the court," he said. "Sentencing       is extremely complex. I would never question what a judge brings       down."              Asked about Potts and Punko being called "pawns of police," Shinkaruk       said: "Investigating criminal organizations is extremely complicated.       ... We certainly worked within the means of the law."              Potts and Punko pleaded guilty last Dec. 7 to trafficking cocaine,       possessing more than $387,000 cash that was the proceeds of crime and       conspiring to produce methamphetamine in a drug lab and distribute it.              The guilty pleas came after Leask last year tossed out the criminal       organization charges, which alleged Potts and Punko committed their       drug crimes for the benefit of a criminal organization -- the East End       Hells Angels.              Leask concluded the Crown could not proceed on the criminal       organization charges because a jury last summer had acquitted Potts,       Punko and two other Hells Angels members of similar charges. The Crown       is also appealing that ruling by Leask.              During sentencing Friday, Leask said he would have sentenced Punko to       six years in prison if the case had gone to trial, but deducted one       year for pleading guilty, deducted another year for the "police       involvement in creating the crimes" and gave 34 months' credit for the       time Punko served in pretrial custody.              The judge found that police used an agent, Michael Plante, who fed       Punko's addiction to the prescription painkiller Percocet and got       Punko involved in methamphetamine production.              Punko, 43, also sold Plante five kilograms of cocaine. Plante       infiltrated the East End Hells Angels by being accepted to apply as a       Hells Angels member.              Punko was previously convicted of cultivating marijuana, mischief       under $5,000, contempt of court for refusing to testify at another       Hells Angels trial and for threatening a prosecutor at a Hells Angels       trial in 2002.              Potts, 49, had a previous criminal record for possession of stolen       property and using a stolen credit card, careless use of a firearm and       possession of property obtained by crime.              Potts pleaded guilty last year to being involved in a meth lab with       Plante and selling him 28 ounces of cocaine.              The judge found Potts was not a sophisticated criminal and was, at the       time of his crimes, an alcoholic addicted to Percocets supplied by       Plante.              Last summer, a jury convicted Punko, Potts and two other Hells Angels       members, Ronaldo Lising and Jean Violette, of weapons offences and       extortion.              nhall@vancoversun.com       ----------------------------------------------------------------       ----------------------------------------------------------------       ------------------------------------------------------------       Appeal court orders new trial for accused drug dealer        Panel finds trial judge made a number of errors        By Neal Hall, Vancouver SunMarch 13, 2010 Three judges of the B.C.       Court of Appeal on Friday ordered a new trial for Nima Ghavami, who is       accused of distributing and trafficking methamphetamine with members       of the Hells Angels.              Ghavami is accused of actively participating in a plan to produce and       distribute methamphetamine by handling about $100,000 cash and 14       kilograms of methamphetamine over a one-year period.              The trial judge, Justice Peter Leask, previously entered a judicial       stay of proceedings of the charges against Ghavami because of a       44-month trial delay, which the judge found was caused mostly by the       Crown.              Leask concluded that the trial delay violated Ghavami's constitutional       right to a trial within a reasonable amount of time.              After the stay, Ghavami, a former strip-club bouncer, said he was       planning to attend law school in Victoria.              He will have to put that plan on hold to see what transpires at his       trial.              The Crown appealed Leask's ruling and three appeal court judges found       the trial judge made a number of errors.              The appeal panel found that while a 44-month trial delay was "a very       long time," it did not infringe on Ghavami's right to a trial within a       reasonable time. The appeal court panel noted that Ghavami was on bail       under strict conditions, which were relaxed as time went on, while       awaiting trial.              "When balanced against the public's interest in the trial of the       allegations, the balance favours a trial," Appeal Court Justice Ian       Donald said in written reasons released Friday.              "This was a complicated prosecution arising from a difficult       investigation, alleging very serious misconduct. As it unfolded, it       required the time it took," said the judgment, which is online at:       http://www.courts.gov.bc.ca/jdb-txt/CA/10/01/2010BCCA0126.htm              The Crown is appealing a number of rulings made by Leask.              nhall@vancouversun.com       ----------------------------------------------------------------       ----------------------------------------------------------------       -----------------------------------------------------------       Judge Leask is a disgrace to the bench and should resign. Google group       search, "Judge Peter Leask" for more info.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca