XPost: news.admin.net-abuse.email
From: spamtrap@spamcop.net
In article ,
"Kevin Provance" wrote:
> Having stumbled upon this NG quite by accident, and having spent most of the
> day reading up on this sad, but amusing situation - including pages posted
> on both sides - I'm in the way of thinking that this Jaime character is -
> not to put to fine a point on it - full of shit. There is too much evidence
> one can search for independently that backs up the claims made by the
> regulars of this NG.
He is.
Unfortunately, at least some of the people hassling with him, while
having legitimate grudges, are also full of sh*t. Others are just drama
queens who will eventually, full of haughty self-righteousness, declare
the time for drama and posting on this topic to end (ignoring their
central role in the drama in the first place).
The whole faux trip to Canada had no point is an example of the
fundamental dishonesty that pervades at least some of these 'people'.
The person who did it had done the same thing before for no apparent
reason other than lulz and USENET posturing. Sadly, one of the more
credible players lowered his own credibility by providing pictures to be
used for "evidence" of this faux trip. How can anyone trust anything
they say or do?
Sadly, it is like the OJ murder case. Conventional wisdom is that (a) OJ
did it and (b) the LAPD manufactured some evidence to ensure a
conviction. The net result was an acquittal. Similarly, the group of
kooks dealing with the kook manufacture "evidence" of the kook's
kookiness, when plenty of evidence exists. The result - at least
deniability.
Yet I can hear the refrain from the poser's chorus - "Killfile Us". What
is it you are trying to accomplish, exactly? Posting self-evident,
elaborate lies on USENET accomplishes what exactly?
A pox on all their houses.
(can.legal mercy snipped from follow-ups)
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
