Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    can.legal    |    Debating Canuck legal system quirks    |    10,932 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 9,687 of 10,932    |
|    no.top.post@gmail.com to All    |
|    How does due process work?    |
|    27 May 12 21:44:17    |
      XPost: uk.legal              In a civil matter, are the facts all to be set down in the pleadings,       before the matter is heard?       If so what is to be heard?       If not, is it not very amateurish and wastefull of court resources to       NOT establish the essential facts, which may require time consuming       evidence collection, before the hearing?       Is the sytem considered as being an adverserial system, and thus the       Court may NOT initiate it's own argument/s?       Do the rules recognise that a finite time is required to prepare a legal       argument and/or a rebuttal?       By 'argument', I mean a construction of:        facts plus statutes and precedence(sp?) leading a to conclusion in law.       What is the time allowed to prepare and file/serve an affidavit       replying to a 'founding affidavit': the initial document of the plaintiff?       How many rounds/cycles of affidavits are allowed?       Where would I read on line, the procedure/rules relating to my       questions?              == TIA.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca