Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    can.legal    |    Debating Canuck legal system quirks    |    10,932 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 9,689 of 10,932    |
|    Norman Wells to no.top.post@gmail.com    |
|    Re: How does due process work?    |
|    28 May 12 08:53:54    |
      XPost: uk.legal       From: hex@unseen.ac.am              no.top.post@gmail.com wrote:       > In a civil matter, are the facts all to be set down in the pleadings,       > before the matter is heard?       > If so what is to be heard?       > If not, is it not very amateurish and wastefull of court resources to       > NOT establish the essential facts, which may require time consuming       > evidence collection, before the hearing?       > Is the sytem considered as being an adverserial system, and thus the       > Court may NOT initiate it's own argument/s?       > Do the rules recognise that a finite time is required to prepare a       > legal argument and/or a rebuttal?       > By 'argument', I mean a construction of:       > facts plus statutes and precedence(sp?) leading a to conclusion in       > law. What is the time allowed to prepare and file/serve an affidavit       > replying to a 'founding affidavit': the initial document of the       > plaintiff? How many rounds/cycles of affidavits are allowed?       > Where would I read on line, the procedure/rules relating to my       > questions?              I would think Google might be a start. It helps with all sorts of       homework questions.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca