home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   can.legal      Debating Canuck legal system quirks      10,932 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 9,689 of 10,932   
   Norman Wells to no.top.post@gmail.com   
   Re: How does due process work?   
   28 May 12 08:53:54   
   
   XPost: uk.legal   
   From: hex@unseen.ac.am   
      
   no.top.post@gmail.com wrote:   
   > In a civil matter, are the facts all to be set down in the pleadings,   
   > before the matter is heard?   
   > If so what is to be heard?   
   > If not, is it not very amateurish and wastefull of court resources to   
   > NOT establish the essential facts, which may require time consuming   
   > evidence collection, before the hearing?   
   > Is the sytem considered as being an adverserial system, and thus the   
   > Court may NOT initiate it's own argument/s?   
   > Do the rules recognise that a finite time is required to prepare a   
   > legal argument and/or a rebuttal?   
   > By 'argument', I mean a construction of:   
   >  facts plus statutes and precedence(sp?) leading a to conclusion in   
   > law. What is the time allowed to prepare and file/serve an affidavit   
   > replying to a 'founding affidavit': the initial document of the   
   > plaintiff? How many rounds/cycles of affidavits are allowed?   
   > Where would I read on line,  the procedure/rules relating to my   
   > questions?   
      
   I would think Google might be a start.  It helps with all sorts of   
   homework questions.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca