Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    can.legal    |    Debating Canuck legal system quirks    |    10,932 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 9,721 of 10,932    |
|    John Turmel to All    |
|    TURMEL: Spottiswood needs constitutional    |
|    10 Nov 12 07:18:46    |
      From: johnturmel@yahoo.com              TURMEL: Spottiswood needs constitutional challenge witnesses              JCT: At Mike Spottiswood's continuing pre-trial on Nov 20,       he has to hand in a list of the witnesses he wants to come       to London in January to testify about the flaws in the       MMAR. Since these are judges, the more people who repeat the       same truth, the more true it seems to them, since they can't       figure it out on their own.              Here are the flaws in the MMAR we want witnesses to testify       to so the court will declare the MMAR unconstitutional for:              a) Section 32(e) limiting exemptees per gardener;       b) Section 32(d) limiting gardeners per site;       c) S.65(1) forcing exemptees to destroy their medication       when Health Canada is late in renewing exemption;       d) allowing an almost total majority of doctors to opt out;       e) delays in application processing;       f) delays in renewal processing;       g) delays in amendment processing;       h) delays in RCMP criminal record check for growers;       i) failure to exempt Canada's 400,000 epileptic population;       j) failure to provide a Drug Identification Number (DIN) to       enable financial support as for any other prescribed       medication;       k) unreasonably compelling yearly renewals for those with       permanent diseases;       l) prohibiting the removal of impurities to obtain the       remaining hash and oil;       m) No respite from growing full-time, can't grow and save       bulk;       n) Insecure mailed documentation increases danger;       o) No fall-back to buy H.C. herb when crop fails;       p) Exemptee cannot remove Designated Grower until end of       permit;       q) Cash costs to get doctor to fill out MMAR forms;       r) Health Canada's 12% strain is recreational, not       medicinal;       s) No exchanging to find different strains for different       pains;       t) Different strains provide different yields making the       number of plants the wrong main limiting factor;       u) Financial advantage lost by not getting patients off       high-cost chemical drugs onto low-cost herbal medications.       v) harassing phone calls from Health Canada non-doctors       invading patient privacy to urge doctors to lower dosages;       w) Five million Canadians do not have doctors and cannot       avail themselves of the program when it might be most       suited;       x) stress caused by all these defects.        TWO NEW ONES:       y) Can't buy from Health Canada while growing 1st crop!       z) too few plants force more costly growth of big plants              JCT:       y) Exemptee has to do without while he waits for 1st crop!       z) Lumens of light only get down about 1.5 feet so it's more       cost-effective to have 2-foot plants instead of 6 footers.       Growers are forced to use most expensive size.              Mike's trial will be in January. I need everyone, and I mean       everyone, we need a big list of peeved-off people to really       scare the Crown. Imagine if we had a team of 100 witnesses       ready to go for everyone! Har har har har. Whatever team       Mike gets organized will be usable by all!              Bela Beke's going to have his trial in Brockville next year       too. So the list is important to him too.              So if you've been victimized by the MMAR, time to tell the       tale.              Even if you're not exempted, if you've looked for a doctor       and couldn't find one, that would help.              So Mike needs his list of witnesses and what they "will say"       by Nov 20. That's 10 days for you to send him an email with       the sections you can testify about ticked off.              Come on people, time to have so many witnesses the Crown       gets freaked out. If the judge asks why we need so many need       to testify that they couldn't find a doctor, we can say we       don't know how many it will take to impress our judge so       we're coming with the max, here's the minimum, and there may       be more.              Unless the Crown wants to agree that the flaws exist and       cause harm. Har har har har har har har              Come on team, we need everybody here and now, to scare them       shitless. Once the list is organized, everyone gets to use       it from now on with more and more. Har har har.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca