home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   can.legal      Debating Canuck legal system quirks      10,932 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 9,721 of 10,932   
   John Turmel to All   
   TURMEL: Spottiswood needs constitutional   
   10 Nov 12 07:18:46   
   
   From: johnturmel@yahoo.com   
      
   TURMEL: Spottiswood needs constitutional challenge witnesses   
      
   JCT: At Mike Spottiswood's continuing pre-trial on Nov 20,   
   he has to hand in a list of the witnesses he wants to come   
   to London in January to testify about the flaws in  the   
   MMAR. Since these are judges, the more people who repeat the   
   same truth, the more true it seems to them, since they can't   
   figure it out on their own.   
      
   Here are the flaws in the MMAR we want witnesses to testify   
   to so the court will declare the MMAR unconstitutional for:   
      
   a) Section 32(e) limiting exemptees per gardener;   
   b) Section 32(d) limiting gardeners per site;   
   c) S.65(1) forcing exemptees to destroy their medication   
   when Health Canada is late in renewing exemption;   
   d) allowing an almost total majority of doctors to opt out;   
   e) delays in application processing;   
   f) delays in renewal processing;   
   g) delays in amendment processing;   
   h) delays in RCMP criminal record check for growers;   
   i) failure to exempt Canada's 400,000 epileptic population;   
   j) failure to provide a Drug Identification Number (DIN) to   
   enable financial support as for any other prescribed   
   medication;   
   k) unreasonably compelling yearly renewals for those with   
   permanent diseases;   
   l) prohibiting the removal of impurities to obtain the   
   remaining hash and oil;   
   m) No respite from growing full-time, can't grow and save   
   bulk;   
   n) Insecure mailed documentation increases danger;   
   o) No fall-back to buy H.C. herb when crop fails;   
   p) Exemptee cannot remove Designated Grower until end of   
   permit;   
   q) Cash costs to get doctor to fill out MMAR forms;   
   r) Health Canada's 12% strain is recreational, not   
   medicinal;   
   s) No exchanging to find different strains for different   
   pains;   
   t) Different strains provide different yields making the   
   number of plants the wrong main limiting factor;   
   u) Financial advantage lost by not getting patients off   
   high-cost chemical drugs onto low-cost herbal medications.   
   v) harassing phone calls from Health Canada non-doctors   
   invading patient privacy to urge doctors to lower dosages;   
   w) Five million Canadians do not have doctors and cannot   
   avail themselves of the program when it might be most   
   suited;   
   x) stress caused by all these defects.   
        TWO NEW ONES:   
   y) Can't buy from Health Canada while growing 1st crop!   
   z) too few plants force more costly growth of big plants   
      
   JCT:   
   y) Exemptee has to do without while he waits for 1st crop!   
   z) Lumens of light only get down about 1.5 feet so it's more   
   cost-effective to have 2-foot plants instead of 6 footers.   
   Growers are forced to use most expensive size.   
      
   Mike's trial will be in January. I need everyone, and I mean   
   everyone, we need a big list of peeved-off people to really   
   scare the Crown. Imagine if we had a team of 100 witnesses   
   ready to go for everyone! Har har har har. Whatever team   
   Mike gets organized will be usable by all!   
      
   Bela Beke's going to have his trial in Brockville next year   
   too. So the list is important to him too.   
      
   So if you've been victimized by the MMAR, time to tell the   
   tale.   
      
   Even if you're not exempted, if you've looked for a doctor   
   and couldn't find one, that would help.   
      
   So Mike needs his list of witnesses and what they "will say"   
   by Nov 20. That's 10 days for you to send him an email with   
   the sections you can testify about ticked off.   
      
   Come on people, time to have so many witnesses the Crown   
   gets freaked out. If the judge asks why we need so many need   
   to testify that they couldn't find a doctor, we can say we   
   don't know how many it will take to impress our judge so   
   we're coming with the max, here's the minimum, and there may   
   be more.   
      
   Unless the Crown wants to agree that the flaws exist and   
   cause harm. Har har har har har har har   
      
   Come on team, we need everybody here and now, to scare them   
   shitless. Once the list is organized, everyone gets to use   
   it from now on with more and more. Har har har.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca