6795e3f5   
   XPost: alt.fan.john-turmel, can.politics, alt.drugs   
   XPost: alt.conspiracy   
   From: johnturmel@yahoo.com   
      
   JCT: A few weeks ago, I got a call from Doug Brazier who had   
   been charged with S.7(1) cultivation and S5(2) Possession   
   for the Purpose of Trafficking but who had then received an   
   exemption. He filed his Quash Motion and Return of Pot   
   motion (within the required 60 days). He longer   
   Constitutional Stay motion could be added later if he had   
   to. He didn't have to.   
      
   Today, he received a letter from the Crown announcing that   
   they were withdrawing his charges, giving him back all his   
   equipment; but not his pot since he wasn't exempt when he   
   was busted. Arguing Hitzig 170, he's saying he proved   
   medical when busted by getting an exemption so why shouldn't   
   he get his medicine back like Derek Francisco did?   
      
   Of course, it's not up to the Crown to decide if he should   
   get his cannabis back, it's up to the judge who will be   
   seized of the motion the moment the Crown withdraws on Jan   
   8. What a nice way to start the day; with a non-loss I'll   
   soon be able to add to my http://johnturmel.com/wins.htm   
   page. Stay tuned for Jan 8.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)