From: johnturmel@yahoo.com   
      
   TURMEL: Spottiswood mentors Paul Lemmond & Joe Dickinson Assaults   
      
   JCT: Senior Superior Court Justice Heeney at London said   
   Mike couldn't argue the two dozen flaws we say make the MMAR   
   deficient because he wasn't in the regime when he was   
   busted. So he couldn't claim it didn't work for him. But   
   Mike had a couple of cards to play and strike back!   
      
   Mike's been mentoring Paul Lemmond who was just recently   
   busted in London for an identical case. He just got his   
   medical exemption too. We must simply prepare an argument   
   that Paul can do what J.P. and Mernagh did even if Mike   
   wasn't allowed.   
      
   Paul was charged in a "Million Dollar" 1,000-plant bust, 900   
   clones! Har har har. A million dollar bust! I guess Ray   
   Turmel should have no problem arguing to Federal Court that   
   the 49 clones he destroyed before his renewed exemption got   
   to him on time are worth $1,000 each if the London Crown say   
   Paul's clones are!   
      
   Here's Paul's story from medpot-discuss:   
      
   I could really use some advice   
   Sat May 18, 2013 11:33 pm   
      
   My name is Paul Lemmond and if you follow London area news   
   you may have heard that the police raided my house and are   
   suggesting that I had a million dollar grow operation under   
   fluorescent lights. 90 percent of the "plants" they took   
   from me did not have roots.   
      
   The reason I started growing pot and using it was after an   
   accident I had where I bumped my head, which left a huge   
   bump, and now suffer from a ringing in my left ear that   
   never stops. I have tried every over the counter pain   
   reliever until my guts were sore and nothing relieves the   
   pain like pot. I do have a job and cannot be high at work so   
   I decided to try juicing the raw leaves. There were no   
   plants in bud and they left all my lights because they were   
   fluorescents. I feel as though the media is having a field   
   day with this in an attempt to destroy my life when I was   
   only trying to naturally medicate myself.   
      
   JCT: So Mike Spottiswood spent a lot of time helping him   
   organize his documentation, file and serve them, and pick up   
   where Mike's railroading left off! It could be expedited   
   since it's ready, same witnesses, same preparation already   
   done? Not like if it were in another jurisdiction, this is   
   right in London!   
      
   Thu Jun 20, 2013 10:53 pm   
      
   Tomorrow will be my first court date after being charged a   
   little over a month ago and since I have been busy.   
      
   I managed to find a doctor finally that agrees to the   
   medical use of marijuana and now qualify for an exemption   
   thanks to all the people here.   
      
   I also filed my motion for return over two weeks ago. Thank   
   you to everyone here trying to make a difference and any   
   other advice would always be appreciated.   
      
   JCT: Har har har har har har. The London Crowns now have   
   another guy who just got his medical exemption fighting back   
   with the full armaments developed from Mike's pre-trials.   
   Except we'll include why he can challenge other flaws like   
   Sfetkopoulos challenged S.43, like Beren challenged S.54,   
   like Mernagh challenged not enough doctors, like the BC case   
   challenged the "no removal of impurities to make hash," why   
   should they be allowed to raise all these flaws and not us?   
   With Mike leading Paul through the attack. Har har har! And   
   Mike can testify as one of his medical witnesses to the   
   horror he endured which gets Dr. Torment who took his   
   renewal out of the mail until prompted to get it off his   
   desk and back in the mail into discussion. Mike should now   
   have a good story to tell lots of courts. Because I know how   
   to get it all in.   
      
   Mike was a sick guy wanting to get into the regime but only   
   getting in after being charged. He wanted to prove Bad   
   Exemption to have his CDSA charge quashed as No Offence. The   
   judge ruled sick guys who didn't belong when charged can't   
   object to the regime they weren't affected by. (Too harsh   
   access requirements isn't an effect?)   
      
   J.P. was a healthy kid who never wanted to get into the   
   regime. He got to prove Bad Exemption to have his CDSA   
   charge quashed as No Offence by citing Hitzig. The judge   
   ruled it didn't matter whether you belonged to the regime   
   since J.P. never could, it only mattered that the exemption   
   hadn't worked.   
      
   So if Mike hadn't told them he was an established medical   
   user who had failed to qualify for years until now, then the   
   judge couldn't have said he didn't have his exemption at the   
   time so he can't argue it didn't work. Yet, J.P. was not an   
   Exemptee complaining about not getting on the MMAR, was he?   
      
   So if J.P. could move to quash without ever trying to get on   
   the regime and Mike can't move to quash because he finally   
   got on, then we'd better not tell them that Paul has now got   
   on and let him fight it like J.P. who didn't need to get on,   
   as a healthy person who could never get on, so Paul won't be   
   disqualified for being a sick person who eventually got on.   
      
   So Paul will not claim the MMAR hurt him, as Spottiswood   
   did, not claim the MMAR failed him, as Mike did, but he will   
   claim the MMAR did not work, as J.P. did. But Mike and all   
   the medical witnesses can testify the MMAR did not work for   
   them covering the Hitzig role played in J.P.   
      
   So that was the travesty of Mike's railroading. A guy who   
   can't qualify can argue the MMAR is deficient but a guy who   
   finally does qualify can not! Har har har har har har. When   
   you parse the judge's ruling, it does turn out pretty funny.   
   The healthy guy got to challenge the MMAR but the guy who   
   finally got on the malfunctioning machine cannot!   
      
   So Paul is not going to be one of his own patient witnesses.   
   He's not even going to tell them he's exempted until he has   
   to establish medical need in front of his jury! He's going   
   to play it like J.P.: "I'm not sick but these sick guys are   
   going to testify the MMAR didn't work for them and if the   
   MMAR wasn't working for the sick guys, the JP court says   
   non-sick guys like me get off too. Silly, eh, for Paul to   
   have to hide the fact he now qualifies for the regime to get   
   the same treatment healthy J.P. got that sick Mike did not.   
      
   What does that say about the treatment Mike did get?   
   Imagine, being sick meant Mike couldn't do what non-sick   
   J.P. could! And the judge kept telling Mike to quit bringing   
   up that J.P. did it. And imagine berating Mike for his   
   memory lapses. If this had been out in the real world, I'd   
   have gone over the table at him.   
      
   So pursuant to the Heeney decision that exemptees may not   
   prove the regime they now belong to deficient while non-   
   exemptees always may prove it is, no one will plead medical   
   need any more until it's a defence in front of a jury.   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)