From: johnturmel@yahoo.com   
      
   TURMEL: MedPot Dynamic Duo Turmel-McIntyre in Fed Crt July 3   
      
   JCT: In last week's Applications by Ray Turmel and Henriette   
   McIntyre, Ray's was to take down the "glitch" at the web   
   site causing the bogus rejections and Henriette's was to get   
   a present-dated Authorization and to be processed under the   
   old regulations so she gets her full grow year.   
      
   Health Canada immediately satisfied Henriette's Part A   
   relief, a current-dated Authorization (but under the new   
   regs) and now she's going for part B, to be processed under   
   the old regs so she can get her whole grow year. Ray's was   
   put off as not that much of an emergency which could wait   
   for the General Sittings on Wednesdays.   
      
   So Notices of Return of Application were filed on the   
   Attorney General of Canada yesterday to be back before the   
   Federal Court at its General Sittings on Monday morning.   
      
   Henriette Marie McIntyre   
   Gatineau J8Y 6N8   
   Email: johnturmel@yahoo.com   
      
   June 28 2013   
      
   Pauline Chartrand,   
   Federal Court of Canada administrator   
   90 Sparks St.  Ottawa   
      
   Dear Ms. Chartrand   
      
   I served and filed my application for the re-processing   
   of my Authorization to Possess and Produce medical   
   marijuana under the old regulations that I was due having   
   my Authorization completed and mailed out before the June   
   19 2013 publication of the new regulations in the   
   Canada Gazette. It's obvious if I was processed before   
   the new regime and received my permits before the new   
   regime, I should not have been processed under the new   
   regime.   
      
   So this Notice for Return of Application is being asked   
   for on only 2 clear days and not 3 clear days because the   
   Crown is prepared and will be caused no inconvenience. My   
   tort is for such elementary relief that it could be dealt   
   with summarily or even satisfied again before we get into   
   court.   
      
   Henriette Marie McIntyre   
      
   CC: Attorney General for Canada   
      
   File No:   
                         FEDERAL COURT   
   BETWEEN:   
                   Henriette Marie McIntyre   
                                                   Applicant   
                              and   
                  Attorney General of Canada   
                                                  Respondent   
      
        APPLICATION UNDER S.18 OF THE FEDERAL COURT ACT   
      
                NOTICE OF RETURN OF APPLICATION   
      
   TAKE NOTICE THAT on Wednesday July 3 2013 at 10am,   
   Henriette Marie McIntyre will make a motion to the Court   
   on short notice in person or as soon thereafter as the   
   motion can be heard at 90 Sparks St. Ottawa.   
      
   THE APPLICATION BEFORE THE APPLICATION FOR JUDICIAL   
   REVIEW WAS FILED FOR an Order granting Applicant interim   
   or summary relief:   
      
   1) a personal constitutional exemption to use marijuana   
   for medical purposes until the Applicant's Health Canada   
   exemption AP-HMM-09-M55571140-54-13-A which was mailed   
   June 18 but whose issuance was post-dated to June 28   
   2013, takes effect; a personal constitutional exemption   
   to my grower Nicole Van Edig to produce my marijuana for   
   medical purposes until the Applicant's Health Canada   
   Designated Grower's permit DPL-NV-09-M777471140-43-13-A   
   which was mailed June 18 but whose issuance was post-   
   dated to June 28 2013, takes effect.   
      
   2) an Order that Applicant's Authorizations to Possess   
   and to Produce be re-processed under the pre-June 19   
   regime they should have been processed under.   
      
   AND FOR ANY ORDER abridging the time for service or   
   amending any error or omission which this Honourable   
   Court may allow.   
      
   The Part A relief sought was satisfied before Justice Annis   
   when Health Canada immediately issued a new Authorization to   
   replace her post-dated one. The remaining issue was   
   adjourned without a date.   
      
   THE GROUNDS FOR THE APPLICATION ARE that if Applicant's   
   Authorization was mailed out on Jun 18 2013, its issuance   
   date should have been June 18 2013, not post-dated to June   
   28 2013 so she would fall under the new more onerous and   
   life-threatening regulations published in the Canada Gazette   
   on June 19 2013. Applicant's Authorization's Issuance date   
   properly processed under the old regime on June 18 2013   
   would make hers the last year-long authorization possible.   
      
   Though Health Canada acted immediately to correct her   
   glitch, it issued an authorization again processed under the   
   new regime that had not been in force when her authorization   
   had been due.   
   Dated at Ottawa on June 25 2013.   
   Henriette Marie McIntyre   
      
   JCT: And now Ray's Return of Application:   
      
   Raymond J. Turmel   
   6 Des Noisetiers   
   Grenville-sur-la-Rouge  J0V 1B0 Quebec.   
   Tel: 819-242-9902  Fax: 519-753-5122 Cell: 819-328-6279   
   Email: johnturmel@yahoo.com   
      
   June 28 2013   
      
   Pauline Chartrand,   
   Federal Court of Canada administrator   
   90 Sparks St.  Ottawa   
      
   Dear Ms. Chartrand   
      
   There are now almost 2,500 renewal applications received   
   in the past 4 weeks on the desks of Health Canada being   
   and about to be rejected due to the unmentioned Form F   
   glitch I was caught on that remains on the Health Canada   
   web site. It is to prevent those bogus rejections going   
   out right now that mandates the urgency of the motion.   
      
   The only way to stop them going out so they suffer the   
   same as I did is for the court to summarily strike down a   
   stupid yearly requirement as unnecessary, superfluous!   
   That stops all bogus rejections dead in their tracks and   
   solves the Crown's problems about people coming to   
   Federal Court to complain like I did at the same time.   
   The requirement for this rejection-causing form is so   
   stupid and detrimental to the health of the patients that   
   I hope to convince the judge to act summarily and on   
   short notice for the Return of the Application. Since the   
   Crown was aware since last week, I hope to convince the   
   judge there should be no problem with 2 days clear notice   
   rather than 3.   
      
   All grounds are the same with S.65, a completely superfluous   
   threat which is already contained in the Criminal Code whose   
   only purpose is to torment renewers.   
   Yours truly,  Ray Turmel   
      
   File No:   
                         FEDERAL COURT   
   BETWEEN:   
                       Raymond J. Turmel   
                                                   Applicant   
                              and   
                  Attorney General of Canada   
                                                  Respondent   
      
        APPLICATION UNDER S.18 OF THE FEDERAL COURT ACT   
      
                NOTICE OF RETURN OF APPLICATION   
      
   TAKE NOTICE THAT on Wednesday July 3 2013 at 10am,   
   Raymond J. Turmel will make a motion to the Court on   
   short notice in person or as soon thereafter as the   
   motion can be heard at 90 Sparks St. Ottawa.   
      
   THE APPLICATION BEFORE THE APPLICATION FOR JUDICIAL   
   REVIEW WAS FILED FOR an Order granting Applicant interim   
   or summary relief:   
      
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)