home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   can.legal      Debating Canuck legal system quirks      10,932 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 9,818 of 10,932   
   John KingofthePaupers Turmel to All   
   TURMEL: Laurence Cherniak got S.56 exemp   
   29 Jan 14 03:24:07   
   
   From: johnturmel@yahoo.com   
      
   JCT: Laurence Cherniak just received a 3-page Letter of   
   Exemption to Feb 28 2014 issued by the Ministry under S.56.   
   That's kind of neat. I thought they'd have send him a new   
   Authorization To Possess dated Feb 28, but no, a S.56 Letter   
   of Exemption:   
      
   "Dear Mr. Cherniak:   
   In accordance with Mr. Justice de Montigny's court order   
   dated Jan 20 2014, (Docket T-164-14), and subject to   
   conditions herein, you are hereby exempted pursuant to S.56   
   of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act from the   
   application of subsection 4(1) and 7(1) of the CDSA and   
   subsection 8(1) and section 69 of the Narcotic Control   
   Regulations starting Jan 26 2014."   
      
   JCT: Looking at the Order of Federal Court Justice Yves de   
   Montigny dated Jan 17 2014:   
      
   "The Applicant's authority to possess and to produce dried   
   marijuana for medical purposes under his current   
   Authorization To Possess dried marijuana for medical   
   purposes and Personal Use Production License, both issued   
   under the MMAR and both due to expire on Jan 26 2014, shall   
   be extended by Health Canada to Feb 28 2014."   
      
   JCT: So they were supposed to extend his ATP past Jan 26   
   from Jan 27 to Feb 28 but instead gave him a S.56 Letter of   
   Exemption overlapping Jan 26 to Feb 28. Bet he's the only   
   person who ever got double-coverage for Jan 26, his ATP and   
   his Letter. If there is an overlap, it can't be an extension   
   of his ATP, can it? It is a different remedy than ordered by   
   the judge.   
      
   I wonder if Laurence should give Health Canada a hard time   
   and demand the relief they provide be what the judge ordered   
   and not the relief Health Canada preferred to offer. Har har   
   har har har har. Of course he will. Let's see if we have to   
   ask the judge! And it's only a phone call away.   
      
   And if the judge should ask why a S.56 isn't good enough,   
   Laurence can answer it's because his mentor wants to be a   
   prick who knows a lot of pricks become a wound. Makes for a   
   great story should Laurence get documented double-coverage   
   for the whole range and not just one day!   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca