Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    can.legal    |    Debating Canuck legal system quirks    |    10,932 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 9,818 of 10,932    |
|    John KingofthePaupers Turmel to All    |
|    TURMEL: Laurence Cherniak got S.56 exemp    |
|    29 Jan 14 03:24:07    |
      From: johnturmel@yahoo.com              JCT: Laurence Cherniak just received a 3-page Letter of       Exemption to Feb 28 2014 issued by the Ministry under S.56.       That's kind of neat. I thought they'd have send him a new       Authorization To Possess dated Feb 28, but no, a S.56 Letter       of Exemption:              "Dear Mr. Cherniak:       In accordance with Mr. Justice de Montigny's court order       dated Jan 20 2014, (Docket T-164-14), and subject to       conditions herein, you are hereby exempted pursuant to S.56       of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act from the       application of subsection 4(1) and 7(1) of the CDSA and       subsection 8(1) and section 69 of the Narcotic Control       Regulations starting Jan 26 2014."              JCT: Looking at the Order of Federal Court Justice Yves de       Montigny dated Jan 17 2014:              "The Applicant's authority to possess and to produce dried       marijuana for medical purposes under his current       Authorization To Possess dried marijuana for medical       purposes and Personal Use Production License, both issued       under the MMAR and both due to expire on Jan 26 2014, shall       be extended by Health Canada to Feb 28 2014."              JCT: So they were supposed to extend his ATP past Jan 26       from Jan 27 to Feb 28 but instead gave him a S.56 Letter of       Exemption overlapping Jan 26 to Feb 28. Bet he's the only       person who ever got double-coverage for Jan 26, his ATP and       his Letter. If there is an overlap, it can't be an extension       of his ATP, can it? It is a different remedy than ordered by       the judge.              I wonder if Laurence should give Health Canada a hard time       and demand the relief they provide be what the judge ordered       and not the relief Health Canada preferred to offer. Har har       har har har har. Of course he will. Let's see if we have to       ask the judge! And it's only a phone call away.              And if the judge should ask why a S.56 isn't good enough,       Laurence can answer it's because his mentor wants to be a       prick who knows a lot of pricks become a wound. Makes for a       great story should Laurence get documented double-coverage       for the whole range and not just one day!              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca