From: johnturmel@yahoo.com   
      
   TURMEL: Her Majesty Defaults on Defence to Gold Star Claims   
      
   Jct: So Her Majesty is in Default of filing Her Statement of   
   Defence by Wed Apr 16 after I filed on Wed Feb 26!!! They   
   think they've snuck their motion onto the Big Event docket   
   getting their it filed "All-in-Sam's" file with a "courtesy   
   copy" to me and somehow duck the real threats to life we've   
   raised and only talk about their stay first.   
      
   So their default has given us another angle to get their   
   Motion struck from the docket, not only for being mis-   
   styled, but because a Defendant in Default can't file a   
   Motion! Har har har. Of course, they only put the improper   
   document into Sam's file and so Sam's next shot at the   
   Motion to be faxed in the morning:   
      
   Sam Mellace   
   Thursday April 17 2014   
      
   Federal Court Administrator, Fax: 416-973-2154   
   Re: T-485-14: T-855-14,T-861-14,T-896-14   
      
   Dear Sir/Lady:   
      
   Yesterday, I objected to the Style of Cause of the Attorney   
   General's Motion Record filed Mar 10 2014 which lumps me in   
   with a hundred other files without our being consolidated.   
   Looking at my Proceedings, they added even more names to my   
   file.   
      
   2014-04-15   
   "Letter from Defendant dated 15-APR-2014 asking that T-855-   
   14,T-861-14,T-896-14 be made subject to case management and   
   advising that Plaintiffs will be provided with courtesy   
   copies of its motion record concerning the stay of   
   proceedings filed on 10-APR-2014 received on 15-APR-2014"   
      
   The Crown has failed to file a Statement of Defence within   
   the required 30 days plus 15-day and 4-day stays by Crampton   
   C.J., that's 49 days, which expired yesterday April 16 2014   
   since I filed Feb 26 2014.   
      
   I therefore request that the Motion Record of the Defendant   
   in Default be struck from the file and from the docket for   
   the Apr 29 hearing for being both improperly-styled and for   
   being from a Defendant in Default.   
   Same Mellace   
   CC: Attorney General for Canada Fax: 613-954-1920   
      
   JCT: I'm adding to the pressure:   
      
   John C. Turmel, B.Eng.,   
      
   Wednesday April 17 2014   
      
   Letter to the Federal Court Administrator Fax: 416-973-2154   
      
   Dear Sir/Lady:   
      
   I objected to the Style of Cause of the Attorney General's   
   Motion Record filed Mar 10 2014 which lumps me in with a   
   hundred other files without our being consolidated.   
      
   As of yesterday Apr 16 2014, the Defendant Her Majesty The   
   Queen is in Default of filing their Statement of Defence   
   with the time prescribed in the Rules of the Court.   
      
   I object to having to respond to a Motion by a Defendant in   
   Default and want the Motion struck form the docket of the   
   upcoming Apr 29 2014 hearing of our motions for interim   
   relief.   
      
   I therefore request that the Motion Record of the Defendant   
   in Default be struck from the file it has been filed in and   
   from the docket for the Apr 29 hearing for being both   
   improperly-styled and for being from a Defendant in Default.   
      
   Of course, a properly-styled Motion may be filed up to Apr   
   22 2014.   
   John Turmel   
      
   Jct: That should take the wind out of their sails and make   
   them hussle to get everyone our personalized copies by Apr   
   22 like they should have all along. Ah, they haven't started   
   preparing yet? Gee, I told them a week ago. Should have been   
   ready for worst case scenario, what I usually put them into,   
   they should have known by now.   
      
   I can't relay my constant updates to all these groups. If   
   you want to follow current developments as they happen,   
   you'll have to watch my http://facebook.com/john.turmel for   
   status reports.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)