home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   can.legal      Debating Canuck legal system quirks      10,932 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 9,856 of 10,932   
   John KingofthePaupers Turmel to All   
   TURMEL: Gold Star Notice of Constitution   
   26 Apr 14 09:48:07   
   
   From: johnturmel@yahoo.com   
      
   JCT: Before you can claim constitutional relief, you have to   
   serve a Notice of Constitutional Questions to be discussed   
   not only on the Federal Attorney General but also the 13   
   Provincial and Territorial AGS in case they want to add   
   something. I guess they thought I'd forget. But I did kind   
   of break a rule. I alerted them that the Gold Stars would be   
   with me and maybe the Notice will only apply to me and the   
   judge can use it to stall everyone else (so we can even more   
   people on the docket for next time). So I don't think the   
   judge will want to stall everyone else because they didn't   
   fax one to all 14 AGs too, do you?   
      
                                              File No: T-488-14   
                          FEDERAL COURT   
   BETWEEN:   
                          JOHN C. TURMEL   
                                                      Plaintiff   
                               and   
      
                      HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN   
                                                     Respondent   
      
                NOTICE OF CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION   
      
   1. The Applicant-Plaintiff intends to question the   
   constitutional validity of the Marijuana Medical Access   
   Regulations ("MMAR"), the Marijuana for Medical Purposes   
   Regulations ("MMPR"), and the prohibitions on marijuana in   
   S.4, 5 and 7 of the CDSA.   
      
   2. The question is to be argued on April 29 2014 at 11am EDT   
   at Toronto Federal Court videoconferenced to 10 other   
   Federal Courthouses across Canada in a Motion for Summary   
   Judgment to strike "marijuana" from Schedule II of the CDSA   
   after declaring the exemptions unconstitutional and, in the   
   alternative, a Motion for Interim Exemption pending trial.   
      
   3. The material facts giving rise to the constitutional   
   question are that both the MMAR and MMPR marijuana medical   
   exemption regimes contain threats to access and supply that   
   violate the S.7 Right to Life of those with medical need in   
   the following ways:   
      
   BOTH 1) Require recalcitrant doctor;   
   BOTH 2) Not provide DIN (Drug Identification Number);   
   BOTH 3) Require annual renewals for permanent diseases;   
   BOTH 4) Require unused cannabis to be destroyed;   
   BOTH 5) Refusal or cancellation for non-medical reasons;   
   BOTH 6) Health Canada feedback to doctors on dosages;   
   BOTH 7) Not provide instantaneous online processing;   
   BOTH 8) Not have resources to handle large demand;   
   BOTH 9) Prohibit non-dried forms of cannabis;   
   BOTH 10) Not exempt from CDSA S.5.;   
      
   MMPR 11) ATP valid solely as "medical document";   
   MMPR 12) Licensed Producer may cancel for "business reason";   
   MMPR 13) Prohibit return of medical document to cancelee;   
   MMPR 14) Prohibit production in a dwelling;   
   MMPR 15) Prohibits outdoor production;   
   MMPR 16) Not protect rights to brand genetics;   
   MMPR 17) Not remove financial barriers;   
   MMPR 18) No central registry for police verification;   
   MMPR 19) Not enough Licensed Producers to supply demand;   
   MMPR 20) Prohibit processing > 150 grams.   
      
   MMAR 11) Require a specialist consultation;   
   MMAR 12) Require conventional treatments be inappropriate;   
   MMAR 13) Prohibit more than 2 licenses/grower;   
   MMAR 14) Prohibit more than 4 licenses/site;   
   MMAR 15) Number of plants limit improper;   
   MMAR 16) Not allow any gardening help.   
      
   4. The legal basis for the constitutional question is that   
   each issue tends to reduce rather than increase the chance   
   of patient survival through reduced access and supply of   
   needed marijuana.   
      
   Dated at Brantford April 24 2014.   
   For the Applicant-Plaintiff:   
   John C. Turmel, B.Eng.,   
      
   TO: The Attorney General of Canada Fax: 613-990-7255   
   Attorney General of Alberta Fax: 780-422-6621   
   Attorney General of British Columbia Fax: 250-387-6411   
   Attorney General of Manitoba Fax: 204-945-2517   
   Attorney General of New Brunswick Fax: 506-444-2661   
   Attorney General of Newfoundland Fax: 709-729-2129   
   Attorney General of Northwest Territories Fax: 827-873-0306   
   Attorney General of Nova Scotia Fax: 902-424-7596   
   Attorney General of Nunavut Fax: 867-975-6195   
   Attorney General of Ontario Fax: 416-326-4007   
   Attorney General of Prince Edward Island Fax: 902-368-4910   
   Attorney General of Quebec Fax: 418-646-0027   
   Attorney General of Saskatchewan Fax: 306-787-1232   
   Attorney General of Yukon Fax: 867-393-6379   
      
   JCT: So that's covered.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca