From: johnturmel@yahoo.com   
      
   JCT: When I tried to file my Motion for Summary Judgment   
   after the Crown's time to file a Statement of Defence had   
   run out, it was refused because in a "Simplied Action" for   
   only cash under $50,000, you can't file for Summary   
   Jugdment.   
      
   Of course, this can't be a Simplified Action because I'm   
   filing for injunctive relief with my $300 claim (before   
   Russell Barth's idea to claim for money needed to pay for   
   medication to retirement most others have claimed) but I did   
   write "This is a simplified action" at the top of mine.   
   But...   
      
                                           File No: T-488-14   
                         FEDERAL COURT   
   BETWEEN:   
                        JOHN C. TURMEL   
                                                   Applicant   
                              and   
      
                     HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN   
                                                  Respondent   
      
                         NOTICE OF MOTION   
      
   TAKE NOTICE THAT at 11am on Tuesday April 29 2014 will be   
   heard Applicant's urgent short notice motion at the   
   Federal Court at 180 Queen St. W. Toronto.   
      
   THE MOTION SEEKS to delete "This is a Simplified Action"   
   hand-written on the Statement of Claim upon the insistence   
   of the Registry.   
      
   THE GROUNDS ARE THAT the Statement of Claim was perfect when   
   proffered for filing and only at the insistence of the   
   Registry was the unnecessary addition inscribed.   
      
   AND FOR ANY ORDER abridging any time for service or amending   
   any error or omission which this Honourable Court may allow.   
      
   Dated at Brantford on Thursday April 24 2014.   
   John C. Turmel, B.Eng.,   
      
   JCT: Notice in Point 6 of the Agenda that Justice Phelan   
   added it to the docket.   
      
                      APPLICANT'S AFFIDAVIT   
      
   I, John C. Turmel, residing at 50 Brant Ave Brantford   
   Ontario make oath as follows:   
      
   1. On Feb 26 2014, I proffered a Statement of Claim for   
   filing and was told by the Registry clerk that because my   
   cash claim was for under $50,000, I had to have "This is a   
   simplified Action" on the front page. So I inscribed those   
   words and paid paid the $50 to file the regular Statement of   
   Claim, not a S.48 Statement of Claim.   
      
   Now I am told my Statement of Claim is invalid due to the   
   line I was compelled to inscribe at the insistence of the   
   Registry. It had been perfect all along.   
      
   This Affidavit is made in support of a motion to delete the   
   words improperly inscribed on my Statement of Claim at the   
   insistence of the Registry.   
   John C. Turmel, B.Eng.,   
      
                    APPLICANT'S MEMORANDUM   
      
   PART I - STATEMENT OF FACTS   
      
   1. On Feb 26 2014, my Statement of Claim was proffered for   
   filing but I was told by the Registry clerk that because   
   my cash claim was for under $50,000, I had to have "This   
   is a simplified Action" on the front page. So I inscribed   
   those words and paid paid the $50 to file the regular   
   Statement of Claim, not a S.48 Statement of Claim.   
      
   2. Now Applicant is told the Statement of Claim is   
   invalid due to the line inscribed at the insistence of   
   the Registry. It had been perfect all along.   
      
   PART II - ISSUE   
      
   Should the line improperly inscribed at the insistence of   
   the Registry be deleted?   
      
   PART III - SUBMISSIONS   
      
   Since the Statement of Claim was perfect in its original   
   form and since the improper form is only as a result of   
   the Registry's insistence on the inclusion of the line,   
   it is submitted that the that line should be summarily   
   deleted or whited out from the Statement of Claim.   
      
   PART IV - ORDER SOUGHT   
      
   Applicant seeks an Order deleting or whiting out the line   
   "This is a simplified action" from the Statement of Claim   
   to render it to its originally-proffered and perfected   
   state.   
      
   Dated at Brantford on Thursday April 24 2014.   
   John C. Turmel, B.Eng.,   
      
   JCT: So the Motion for Summary Judgment was de-railed   
   because the written one-liner stands in the way. But it's   
   been served on the Crown and only needs filing. So if the   
   judge says he'll amend my Statement of Claim back to its   
   original perfect form, I can now present my Motion for   
   Summary Judgment I'm allowed to make that's properly served   
   on the Crown and ask for Repeal before we get into Interim   
   Exemptions.   
      
   Because if repeal isn't discussed, and he grants the sick   
   their grows back, there'll be a flood of new Plaintiffs by   
   the time the Summary Judgment comes around.   
      
   If the judge says the Statement of Claim has to be re-filed   
   all over again without the line giving the Crown another 30   
   days before I can file for Summary Judgment, okay, I can   
   fall back on anyone in the first 25 Gold Stars whose Action   
   didn't say "Simplified" and who have not received their   
   Statement of Defence within the 30 days if they'd like to   
   file an instant Motion for Summary Judgment to be heard   
   right then.   
      
   Or later if the court so wishes! Har har har.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)