From: johnturmel@yahoo.com   
      
   Bradley Hunt: EVERYONE BUT JOHN TURMEL HAD STANDING!   
   Jct: Geez, Bradley, you're such a moron. Check the Style of Cause.   
   Terry Parker and John Turmel-Marc Paquette were the Appellants. And   
   Marc-Paquette, most-exempted Exemptee and probably possessor of the   
   most Gold Stars was there for the medical Ins while Terry Parker was   
   there for the medical Never-Ins. Look he's back! They had standing and   
   they were the Appellants. Without us starting it, the Crown couldn't   
   have dragged in Hitzig to switch the names and the credit from me to   
   Alan Young. Right Brad? Without any Appellants, there would have been   
   no "Hitzig-Parker appeal? The Appeal that won everything couldn't have   
   been started by the Hitzig Cross-Appellant, could it have? So just   
   because they switched the name from Parker-Hitzig-Turmel at the last   
   moment to Hitzig-Parker-Turmel doesn't take away from the fact I   
   engineered the whole thing. Plus I taped it all and transcribed it   
   all! Moron, I was there. I've got all the documents, motion records,   
   books of authorities, all styled Parker-Hitzig-Turmel and just because   
   of the switch in the backroom to over-rule Justice Weiler's Order   
   styling Parker first at my request, could Alan very well argue it   
   should have been his Hitzig Cross-Appellant and she said sure, with   
   the necessary 3 judges to overrule her, you blare the steal by the   
   switch in public. Thanks for giving me the chance to once again show   
   you wrong and set everyone straight.   
      
   Gee Brad, you flash the fact I, as a healthy person seeking cannabis   
   for prevention of the things it's good for before getting them (didn't   
   find out about new brains cells until 2006) did not have standing and   
   so couldn't be responsible for the biggest medpot case in Canadian   
   jurisprudence.   
      
   I get the chance to prove without me, it couldn't have happened. I   
   engineered it all obvious for everyone to see who looked at the actual   
   background documentation, oh right Brad doesn't have any and I have it   
   all.   
      
   And just because some one did a quick-shuffle in back-rooms of the   
   Ontario Court of Appeal to over-rule Justice Weiler's Order without   
   discussion or Order so the credit would go to Alan Young instead of   
   John Turmel, the fact remains, John Turmel engineered it all even if   
   it took the sleaziest back-room corruption possible in the highest   
   court of Ontario to shuffle the credit away from the MedPot Combat   
   Engineer.   
      
   After a full hour with no response out of your foul mouth, I'd say   
   that Brad Little Nail cannot dispute that the Great Canadian Gambler   
   won those 4,000 stays with my appeal and Alan Young did not win my   
   4,000 stays with his Cross-Appeal. Har har har har har har. I love to   
   brag, and only get the chance when challenged by a lie. Lucky, Brad's   
   full of lies.   
      
   This one's worth going to post to my TURMEL global groups. Aaahh.   
   Brad's Little Nail losing its erection in surrender made me feel so   
   good.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)