Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    can.legal    |    Debating Canuck legal system quirks    |    10,932 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 9,872 of 10,932    |
|    John KingofthePaupers Turmel to All    |
|    TURMEL: Five Turmel FCC back-burner case    |
|    27 May 14 22:22:37    |
      From: johnturmel@yahoo.com              JCT: Last years, I beat the living       daylights out of Health Canada making them work overtime to hop-to-it       to correct abuses several times!!! I have 6 other cases from last year       before writing the Gold Stars Grow-Op Action bringing 5 new MMAR torts       to our Gold Star hand!!!              RENEWAL EXPIRY JERK-AROUND AND S.65 DESTROY ORDER       1) T-977-13 Ray Turmel: being not-yet-renewed after 7 weeks, should       take 3, with the short notice motion filed in the afternoon, hearing       by 6:30pm (Director General of Justice shows up for a permit fight?       asks judge Roy) Renewal issued before midnight or spanking back in       court on Saturday morning!!              POST-DATED EXEMPTIONS       2) T-1118-13 HC sent Gold Star Henriette McIntyre her exemption post-       dated 10-days. I made HC issue a new exemption for right away.       Judicial Review about post-dating still goes on. Good issue?              UNMENTIONED FORM F GLITCH IN FORM R RENEWAL       3) T-1119-13 Judicial Review against web site glitch omitting to tell       first renewers to also file Form F when it tells them to only file       Form R to renew. 3 weeks later, they get a rejection saying: Even       though the page said only Form R, Form R fine-print says Form F every       time. Didn'tcha see it?              How many ATPs got caught on Ray Turmel's Renewal Form R glitch and got       rejected. Bet we'll have a surprise that it was most. Maybe those who       got jerked around like Ray can ask to be joined to his beef? Anyone       get rejected on first renewal for missing Form F?              LATE AMENDMENTS       4) T-1207-13 Ray moved, exemption amendment had not arrived, nowhere       legal to store pot, illegal again, Judicial Review of late amendments       was on back burner, now on front!!              POST-DATED DOSAGE INCREASES, NOT RIGHT AWAY       5) T-1271-13 Tony Van Edig       T-1308-13 Elisha McDermott       Tony and Elisha got post-dated amended Exemptions not allowing them to       take their increased prescriptions until later. I begged the doctor       for a letter stating she thought they should start away and Dr. Cindy       Shaw sent letters in support of Tony and Elisha starting their higher       dosages right away. Judges said no, oops, error, and not their doofus       decisions come to the front burner! Bad move throwing my back-burner       pots onto the front burners!              So those are the 5 new sleazy MMAR torts added to our hand. Anyone       think that torts that made them look so crooked Louis Proulx had to       hop-to-it to fix it before he could be spanked by the court next       morning aren't going to help us make HC look bad added to our 16 MMAR       torts? Isn't it neat the MMAR is still being used so our complaints       are not yet mooted? I'm giddy, I'd thought continuing those fights was       a waste of time and had given up hope. Now they're back in my hand!              Serendipity, wouldn't you way, for these old card I'd forgotten about       to suddenly pop up in my hand. All that work won't go for naught.       Wheeeeeeee.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca