Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    can.legal    |    Debating Canuck legal system quirks    |    10,932 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 9,897 of 10,932    |
|    Alan Baggett to All    |
|    CRA includes usury in its bag of abusive    |
|    08 Jul 14 03:22:56    |
      From: AlanBaggett@volcanomail.com              CRA includes usury in its bag of abusive tricks :CRA SOTW               CRA includes usury in its bag of abusive tricks       Don Cayo, Vancouver Sun                     Two car loan companies I wrote about last month threaten interest rates of up       to one per cent a day in agreements with poor schmucks who borrow from them,       but both say they don't actually try to collect that much.              Indeed, one company admits the contract isn't enforceable (although, as I have       noted, the Criminal Code forbids not only collecting interest over 60 per cent       a year, but also putting it in a contract).              So if even high-cost lending companies don't have the gall to try to gouge       customers this badly, guess who does? Who actually squeezes one per cent a day       -- more than six times the Criminal Code maximum -- out of unfortunate debtors?              None other than Canada Revenue Agency. It is thumbing its nose at fairness and       the law by nailing any employer who is late remitting tax money withheld from       employee pay with interest so high the rest of us would land in jail if we       tried to impose it on        people who owe us.              The CRA isn't usurious across-the-board, but it's website states explicitly       that for these late remittances the charge will be "3% if the amount is one to       three days late, 5% if it is four or five days late, 7% if it is six or seven       days late, and 10% if        it is more than seven days late."              CRA is also on thin ice with assessments for late income tax filers. If they       owe money, late filers must pay five per cent initially, plus one per cent for       each month until the return is filed. According to my math, this adds up to a       usurious interest        rate on filings that are one to 30 days late, although the rate falls below       the legal maximum for filings that are more than a month late.              Most governments assess hefty levies -- and so they should -- for chicanery or       playing deliberate games with the taxman. But these usurious rates aren't       aimed at law-breakers or game-players -- just people who pay late.              Indeed, the reader who told me about the issue was hit with one-per-cent-a-day       interest when, unbeknownst to him, CRA changed the due date for his       remittances. In a normal business relationship, this would result in a quiet       word, not punishment.              And if CRA wants these usurious rates to punish, then they aren't just       ethically appalling, they're also dumb. It works out to three per cent a day       for people who are just one day late, and just one per cent a day for people       who are three days late. And        it's capped at 10 per cent -- as I read CRA's information, if you're 100 days       late it costs only 10 per cent, or 0.1 per cent a day. So the incentive to pay       promptly diminishes the longer you're late.              This latest example of the kind of taxpayer abuse I've been writing about for       more than a year is right up there with the preposterous assumptions, the       arbitrary demands, the habit of penalizing taxpayers for CRA's own mistakes,       and more.              It reflects the uncaring mindset that produced a 10-per-cent fine -- now       rescinded since it drew scornful media attention -- for paying bills at a CRA       office rather than at a bank. The attitude seems to be that if people       inconvenience the bureaucracy, no        matter how innocently or trivially, they'll be hit with a bazooka.              But the point is that parliamentarians who enacted the Criminal Code thought       charging such high rates is an act so vile that people who do it belong in       jail. And now a branch of government is defying the spirit, if not the letter,       of that law.              As they say in Parliament, too often with cause: Shame, shame!              dcayo@vancouversun.com       (c) The Vancouver Sun               ----------------------------------------------------------------       ------------------------------------       Miss a Tax Tale Miss a lot!       Pop the link below into your browser to view the entire CRA SOTW Library!       http://canada.revenue.agency.angelfire.com        ----------------------------------------------------------------       --------------------------------------       Alan Baggett - http://www.taxcollectorsbible.com/ - Tax Collector's Bible              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca