Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    can.legal    |    Debating Canuck legal system quirks    |    10,932 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 9,914 of 10,932    |
|    Alan Baggett to All    |
|    Canadians spend more on taxes than food,    |
|    19 Aug 14 03:50:21    |
      From: AlanBaggett@volcanomail.com              Canadians spend more on taxes than food, shelter: Fraser Institute : CRA SOTW              CBC News               The average Canadian family spends more on taxes than on food, shelter and       clothing combined,a new study released today by the Fraser Institute, a       Canadian public policy think-tank that focuses on free markets and government       policies targeting consumers.               "If you asked people to name their household's biggest expense, many would       likely say housing, but in reality, the average Canadian family spends more on       taxes than all basic necessities including housing," the report's author       Charles Lammam said of the        paper, which tracks the total tax bill of the average Canadian family from       1961 to 2013.              In 2013, the study says the average Canadian family earned $77,381 and paid       $32,369 in total taxes (or 41.8 per cent of income) compared to 36.1 per cent       for food, shelter and clothing combined, the paper found.              By comparison, in 1961, the average family earned approximately $5,000 and       spent much more of its income on food, shelter and clothing (56.5 per cent),       while $1,675 went to taxes (33.5 per cent).               But not everyone agrees with the Fraser Institute's analysis. "Those numbers       are not directly comparable," said Peter Dungan, an economist at the Rotman       School of Management. "First, in 1961 we did not have medicare," he said. The       report's starting year        baseline begins in 1961, the first year that the federal government started       paying for a national health-care plan, first known as medicare and later       brought under the umbrella of the Canada Health Act.              Moving the onus of health-care spending from individuals onto the state has       put a major cost on the backs of taxpayers along the way, which may be showing       up in the Fraser Institute's report. According to recent numbers by       consultancy Mercer, health-care        spending was less than $100 per person in the early 1960s, 57 per cent of       which was covered by government. But by 2010, per capita health spending had       jumped to $5,614, of which 70 per cent was paid for by Ottawa.              Other big ticket items such as the Canada Pension Plan and Old Age Security       didn't even exist in 1961.              Dungan points to higher education as another factor that needs to be taken       into consideration. "At that point, many Canadians did not even finish high       school, let alone go to university or college.... Part of what's included in       the increase in taxes, is        an increase in educational taxes."              Other criticisms              Canada's booming oil and gas industry over the past 50 years is also a factor.       "Included in those government revenues are royalties on oil and gas, which       were not nearly as high then," said Dungan. He added that in addition to       taking inflation into        consideration, analysts must also consider the relative price of oil and gas       as well as the sheer amount that Canada exports today. "The Fraser Institute       counts those as taxes."              Dungan adds that we should also take into consideration that, relatively       speaking, food has become less expensive, and many consumer goods are       less-expensive imports.              "The report is very misleading," said Iglika Ivanova, economist at the       Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives. "It grossly overestimates the tax       bill of the average Canadian family because of their methodology. They include       things such as business taxes        and import duties in the bill of the average family.              "There is lots of research, mainly from the US, that business tax is largely       paid by shareholders, little is paid by workers ... the average Canadian       family is not a large shareholder," said Ivanova.              Lammam says it is fair to include business taxes because those taxes trickle       down to Canadian families in the form of reduced wages, higher prices and       lower investment returns.              "Corporations are pieces of paper, but it's regular people that pay these       taxes," he said in an interview with the CBC on Tuesday.              The Fraser Institute's measure of an "average Canadian" is also flawed, says       Ivanova. "We need to look at the distributional issues as to who is paying for       what. Averages are becoming less and less meaningful. What does it mean when       you have such large        disparity? ... We've eroded tax fairness. This is a much bigger concern for me       versus the size of the tax bill."               Rising tax burden              All in all, the report's total tax bill represents both visible and hidden       taxes paid to the federal, provincial and local governments. This includes       income taxes, payroll taxes, health taxes, sales taxes, property taxes, fuel       taxes, vehicle taxes,        import taxes, alcohol and tobacco taxes, and more.              Since 1961, the average Canadian family's total tax bill has increased by       1,832 per cent, dwarfing increases in shelter costs (1,375 per cent), clothing       (620 per cent) and food (546 per cent).              "Over the past five decades, the total tax bill grew much faster than the cost       of basic necessities, so now taxes eat up more income than any other single       family expense. With more money going to the government, families have less to       spend on things they        care about, to save for education and retirement, and to pay down household       debt," Lammam said.              Even after accounting for changes in overall prices (inflation) over the       period, the tax bill shot up 147 per cent.              "While there's no doubt that taxes help fund important government services,       the real issue is the amount of taxes that governments take compared to what       we get in return. With almost 42 per cent of income going to taxes, Canadians       should ask whether they        get the best value for their tax dollars."              The Institute has also produced a short, animated video that graphically shows       how the average family's tax bill has changed.              With files from The Canadian Press              -----------------------------------------------------------        Miss a Tax Tale Miss a lot!        Visit the CRA SOTW Library at http://canada.revenue.agency.angelfire.com        ------------------------------------------------------------        Alan Baggett - Tax Collector's Bible - http://taxcollectorsbible.com/              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca