From: johnturmel@yahoo.com   
      
   JCT: Ray just got this letter from the Crown to the Supreme   
   Court of Canada Registrar.   
      
   Saint-Jerome,   
   Friday August 22 2014   
      
   Supreme Court of Canada Registry Officer   
      
   Object: Raymond Turmel vs HMTQ   
      
   To the Registry Officer:   
      
   We received a copy of a receipt that was sent to the   
   applicant, Raymond Turmel, dated 8 August 2014. We have also   
   received a letter from the applicant dated 18 August 2014   
   stating that he wishes to continue his appeal before the   
   Supreme Court of Canada.   
      
   Before the Supreme Court begins to review the documents from   
   the applicant, we wish to transmit the following   
   information:   
      
   On August 18th, 2014, the Quebec Provincial Court acquitted   
   Mr. Turmel of the accusations infile 700-01-118202-137 after   
   the Crown decided not to present any evidence against the   
   accused. A copy of the "proces-verbal" has been joined to   
   the present letter. We are also joining a copy of the   
   decision from the Court of Appeal that the respondent wishes   
   to contest.   
      
   Mr. Turmel being acquitted, we respectfully submit that it   
   is useless for the Supreme Court to review his application.   
   Mr. Turmel is not represented by counsel and may not fully   
   understand the implication of his acquittal.   
      
   We are of the opinion that the application should simply be   
   rejected and the file closed.   
      
   Yours truly,   
   Maxime Lacoursiere   
      
   So Ray sent in this response:   
      
   Raymond J. Turmel   
   6 Des Noisetiers, Grenville-sur-la-Rouge, J0V 1B0 Quebec.   
   Tel: 819-242-9902, Fax: 519-753-5122, Cell: 819-328-6279   
   Email: rayturmel@yahoo.com   
      
   Aug 28 2014   
      
   Supreme Court of Canada Registrar   
   301 Wellington St. Ottawa, ON, K1A 0J1   
   Tel: 996-8666/9138f   
      
   Re: Crown objection dated Aug 22 2014   
      
   Dear Registrar:   
      
   Though I have been acquitted, the same objectionable   
   precedents I was subjected to remain: that a Motion to   
   Amend/Quash may be dismissed   
   a) for lack of Notice of Constitutional Question and   
   b) as an issue for only the Trial Judge.   
      
   These precedents contradict normal court process and now   
   threaten me should such situation arise again.   
      
   I was improperly harmed by those precedents below. I wish to   
   bring those irregularities to the court's attention.   
   _______________________   
   Raymond Turmel   
   FAX CC: Attorney General 450-569-3051 Maxime Lacourciere   
      
   JCT: So the Crown's headaches go on and we get to find out   
   if the Supreme Court is going to let these two silly   
   precedents stand!!! I just want 3 judges signing off that it   
   seems not important enough to fix.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)