From: johnturmel@yahoo.com   
      
   TURMEL: Three $500 costs for Moot Appeals to Supreme Court   
      
   JCT: On Mar 31 2014, Federal Court Justice Crampton issued   
   his second stay of our Gold Star Applicants pending the   
   determination of John Conroy's Allard case. Nine appealed on   
   Apr 1 2014.   
      
   His first stay on Mar 7 had been appealed by 15 Gold Stars   
   but had been mooted when the appeal lapsed and dismissed   
   with no costs.   
      
   On Apr 3 2014, the stay was lifted so once again the appeals   
   were mooted with the remedy now available below but   
   dismissed with $500 costs.   
      
   Since that wasn't fair, three have filed Applications for   
   Leave to Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada.   
   Anthony Van Edig, Dale Conners and Victoria Hollinrake.   
      
   Here is the documentation filed yesterday.   
      
                                          File Number:   
                  IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA   
           (ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL)   
   BETWEEN:   
                         Anthony Van Edig   
                                                      Applicant   
                                            Appellant in appeal   
                               And   
                      Her Majesty The Queen   
                                                     Respondent   
      
                 APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL   
                   Anthony Van Edig, APPLICANT   
         (Pursuant to Rule 25 of the Supreme Court Rules)   
      
                        TABLE OF CONTENTS   
      
   1. Notice of Application for Leave to Appeal..........1   
      
   2. Mar 31 2014 Order of Crampton C.J..................4   
      
   3. Apr 3 2014 Order of Phelan J.......................7   
      
   4. Jun 6 2014 Federal Court of Appeal Order...........9   
      
   5. Jun 6 2014 Federal Court of Appeal Order Reasons...9   
      
   6. Applicant's Memorandum............................16   
      
            NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL   
                   Anthony Van Edig, APPLICANT   
         (Pursuant to Rule 25 of the Supreme Court Rules)   
      
   TAKE NOTICE that Applicant seeks an Order overturning the   
   June 6 2014 decision of the Federal Court of Appeal granting   
   the Respondent $500 in costs.   
      
   THE GROUNDS OF APPEAL are that with my serious health   
   issues, having my Motion for Interim Exemption for Personal   
   Medical Use stayed made my appeal to the higher avenue of   
   relief righteous when filed. On April 2 2014, the appeals of   
   15 Appellants of the March 7 2014 Stay of their Actions by   
   Crampton C.J. were dismissed as mooted by the lifting of the   
   stay on Mar 21 2014 with no costs. On June 6 2014, the   
   appeal of the Appellant of the Mar 31 2014 Stay of my Action   
   by Crampton C.J. was dismissed as mooted by the lifting of   
   the stay on April 3 2014 with $500 costs. If the Mar 7   
   Appellants were not subjected to costs for their righteous-   
   before-being-mooted appeals, the Mar 31 Appellants should   
   not have been subjected to costs for the same righteous-   
   before-being-mooted appeals.   
      
   Dated at Ottawa on Sep 05 2014.   
   __________________________   
   For the Applicant:   
   Anthony Van Edig,   
   ORIGINAL TO: THE REGISTRAR   
   NOTICE TO THE RESPONDENT: A respondent may serve and file a   
   memorandum in response to this application for leave to   
   appeal within 30 days after service of the application. If   
   no response is filed within that time, the Registrar will   
   submit this application for leave to appeal to the Court for   
   consideration pursuant to section 43 of the Supreme Court   
   Act.   
                      APPLICANT'S MEMORANDUM   
                   Anthony Van Edig, APPLICANT   
         (Pursuant to Rule 25 of the Supreme Court Rules)   
      
   PART I - OVERVIEW   
      
   1. Appellants of the Mar 7 stay mooted by lifting of the   
   stay had their appeals dismissed without costs. Appellants   
   of the Mar 31 stay mooted by the lifting of that stay had   
   their appeals dismissed with $500 costs.   
      
   2. On April 2 2014, the appeals of 15 Appellants of the   
   March 7 2014 Stay of their Actions by Crampton C.J. were   
   dismissed as mooted by the lifting of the stay on Mar 21   
   2014 with no costs.   
      
   3. On June 6 2014, the appeal of the Appellant of the Mar 31   
   2014 Stay of my Action by Crampton C.J. was dismissed as   
   mooted by the lifting of the stay on April 3 2014 with $500   
   costs.   
      
   PART II - ISSUE   
      
   4. Should the Respondent have been awarded costs when the   
   appeals were mooted?   
      
   PART III - ARGUMENT   
      
   5. If the Mar 7 Appellants with serious medical issues were   
   not subjected to costs for their righteous before-being-   
   mooted appeals, the Mar 31 Appellants with similar medical   
   issues should not have been subjected to costs for the same   
   righteous-before-being-mooted appeals.   
      
   PART IV - ORDER SOUGHT   
      
   6. Applicant seeks an order overturning the Order for $500   
   costs to be paid to the Respondent.   
      
   Dated at Ottawa on Sep 05 2014.   
   Applicant: Anthony Van Edig,   
      
   Victoria and Dale had made a FEE WAIVER REQUEST. Helps the   
   court understand why they'd complain about costs.   
      
   So that's 40 Applications to the top in my career with   
   another 27 just one step away in the courts of appeal below.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)