Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    can.legal    |    Debating Canuck legal system quirks    |    10,932 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 9,949 of 10,932    |
|    John KingofthePaupers Turmel to All    |
|    TURMEL: Robert Roy Reply to Crown at SCC    |
|    13 Dec 14 01:47:45    |
      From: johnturmel@yahoo.com              JCT: Robert Roy's Reply to the Crown's Response to his       Application for Leave to Appeal the refusal of the lower       courts to exempt him pending trial of his action for repeal       is served today! Keep in mind that Terry Parker, Stephen       Burrows and Ray Turmel also have Applications and each will       deal with different issues.              Terry already replied and he's a Never-In should should have       been first. Ray has his ATP and represents their concerns       under the Manson Order extending the MMAR that threatens       him.              Robert Roy's a "Left-Out," by only 3 days. His exemption       expired 3 days before Justice Manson grand-fathered his grow       permit but not his possess permit. Neat omission. He's       appealed for an interim exemption for personal medical use       and filed an Application for Leave to Appeal the refusals       below, the Crown gave a boiler-plate response, and his Reply       on his personal angle:              Robert Roy              Dec 12 2014              Mr. Roger Bilodeau, Registrar       Supreme Court of Canada       310 Wellington St. Ottawa, K1A 0J1              Mr. Registrar              Re: Robert Roy v. Her Majesty the Queen, File No. 36146              Given the Crown has provided a boiler-plate Response to my       Application and to those of Terrance Parker (35156), Ray       Turmel (36159) and Stephen Burrows (36147), I adopt the       salient arguments in their Replies while focusing on my       particular medical situation.              I have several severe medical problems which were well-       assuaged by marijuana I grew quite affordably under my MMAR       Authorization To Possess and Produce. In late 2013, Health       Canada announced that all MMAR personal production gardens       had to be shut down and all stored stocked destroyed by       April 1 2014 when the MMPR took effect.              On Mar 18 2014, my exemption expired with no practical       purpose in renewing under the MMAR because:       1) I had enough to last and any new crop had to be destroyed       in 2 weeks;       2) it would have wasted $400 in doctor fees to apply;       3) I'm on long-term social services disability pension and       could never afford to apply for the high-priced product sold       by a Licensed Producer under the MMPR.              On Mar 21 2014, three days later, Justice Manson's Order in       Allard v. HMQ grand-fathered my Grow Permit back to 2013 but       not my Possess Permit. Only current permits remained valid.       Had I renewed my MMAR permits for only 3 more days, both       would have been validated, not just the one. How could the       Court have not grand-fathered both? Due to Health Canada's       Directive, I was "Left-Out" of the Manson relief by 3 days!!              How many of Canada's 25,000 medical growers with enough to       last were similarly "Left-Out" by opting not to plant a crop       to just be destroyed? If just those who expired within 3       months of the "April Fool Destruct Day" gave up like I and       Stephen Burrows did, that's a quarter, 6,000 legal medical       growers Left-Out. Probably many more. The Allard decision       shut down more grows than the nation's police combined, the       only difference being the police shut down illegal grows and       the Court shut down 6,000 previously-legal grows. Yet, the       Parker Court ruled it unconstitutional to have to choose       between prison and our health.              Even two of the four Allard Plaintiffs were Left-Out and       their appeal now attempts to remedy that one omission of not       grand-fathering our Possess Permits with the Grow Permits       that cut off thousands of medical users from their legal       status and into outlawry.              The Allard decision resulted in even more loss of access by       extending permits without extending the Health Canada       infrastructure to amend those permits which the Allard       Appeal is now attempting to redress: no provision for       address changes, grower changes, outdoor-indoor changes,       dosage changes, all no longer possible without the Health       Canada infrastructure. Move, permit expires. Designated       Grower moves or dies, permit expires. The omissions in the       Allard remedy have resulted in a continuing catastrophe       affecting only once-legal medical users and I'm one of those       once-legal outlaws.              Finally, the loss of genetics must be staggering. Strains       bred over a decade mostly now gone since it's doubtful the       thousands who shut down transfered their genetics to one of       the few LPs.              But for only 3 days not being able to predict the future       Manson decision and I'd be growing my own medication       economically like many others still now do. But for 3       unlucky days, I am now an outlaw if I keep treating my       conditions with the best medication I've yet found which       recent studies in jurisdictions that have recently repealed       their cannabis prohibition also support. But for 3 lousy       days, I am now faced with insurmountable hurdles to obtain       my prescribed medication. That the courts below could       dismiss my plea for interim exemption for "insufficient       evidence of illness" and for "no reasons," only adds salt to       my wounds.              As I appealed for the very same remedy as the Allard Left-       Outs are appealing for, I hope they find a way to grand-       father our Possess Permits with our Grow Permits. But until       Justice Manson's omissions are corrected, an interim       exemption was and is the only possible remedy that can get       me access to my medicine right away.              It would have been the only possible remedy for David Shea       whose action for exemption was stayed below. He couldn't       show the court sufficient evidence of his medical need and       now he's dead, no more chance to show he really needed it.       Considering the thousands of officially medically-needy       patients who lost their affordable access to medication like       I and Stephen Burrows did, and the sufferings we've endured,       the bureaucratic and judicial genocide going on staggers the       mind.       ____________________       Robert Roy              JCT: And Stephen Burrows wanting to continue shrinking his       tumor coming up last.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca