home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   can.legal      Debating Canuck legal system quirks      10,932 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 9,992 of 10,932   
   John KingofthePaupers Turmel to All   
   TURMEL: Crown chintzes "Consolidated Med   
   16 Apr 15 06:14:32   
   
   From: johnturmel@yahoo.com   
      
   JCT: After losing their opposition to my last motion for an   
   extension of time where they could have ridiculed the non-   
   lawyer for being late but instead over-reached trying to nix   
   everyone's appeals, now they're trying to jerk us around by   
   chintzing on the printing of the Appeal Book.   
      
   You'll remember back in the Big Event, the Crown sent everyone   
   a courtesy copy of their case without asking. Guess not this   
   time. Since it is officially consolidated, I don't know if   
   they Crown has to serve anyone but the Lead Appellant. But   
   since they've now opened the pot, I'm not only going to call   
   (ask the Court to make them pay) but raise (ask the Court to   
   make sure they send everyone a copy).   
      
                                               File No: A-342-14   
                        FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL   
   BETWEEN:   
                           JOHN C. TURMEL   
                                                        Appellant   
                                and   
                       HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN   
                                                       Respondent   
      
                          NOTICE OF MOTION   
      
   TAKE NOTICE of the Appellant's motion in writing filed at the   
   Federal Court of Appeal.   
      
   THE MOTION SEEKS an Order that the Respondent   
   A) defray the cost of the Appeal Book, and   
   B) serve a copy on all Appellants.   
      
   THE GROUNDS are that the consolidation of 26 appeals has so   
   benefited the Respondent that to now make print costs an issue   
   is unconscionably chintzy.   
   Dated at Toronto on April 15 2015.   
   John C. Turmel, B.Eng.,   
      
                       APPLICANT'S MEMORANDUM   
      
   PART I - STATEMENT OF FACTS   
      
   1. Appellant was named "Lead Appellant" for 25 other   
   Appellants who consented to consolidation of our appeals to   
   avoid duplication by all parties.   
      
   2. On Apr 10 2015, the Respondent requested the Lead Appellant   
   pay $597.77 to prepare and file the Appeal Book.   
      
   3. Appellant files at the Supreme Court of Canada in "forma   
   pauperis." Though I can be found online as the   
   KingofthePaupers, with ZERO income until hit 65 years-old next   
   year. To cover my life support, I have to beg, borrow or win   
   at the Brantford Poker casino.   
      
   4. All the other Appellants have been cut off of their regular   
   economical marijuana supply and coping with new high prices   
   puts them in a pauperly situation too.   
      
   PART II - ISSUES IN QUESTION   
      
   5. Is the Right to Life of the patients of such import that   
   the Respondent should defray the $597.77 for the Appeal Book?   
      
   PART III - ARGUMENTS   
      
   6. The Appellant submits Canada has not considered the   
   consequences should Lead Appellant not be able to afford the   
   costs of the Appeal Book. What will the Crown do with the   
   other 25 Appellants without a Consolidated Appeal Book?   
      
   7. The whole purpose in appointing me lead Appellant was to   
   give everyone a break from duplication as serious issues are   
   adjudicated. My dearth of financial resources should not now   
   be cause for a whole lot more inevitable duplication.   
      
   8. Given the resources available to Respondent compared to   
   Appellants, given the large savings accrued to the Respondent   
   by Appellants' consent to consolidation, Respondent has so   
   benefited that to now make print costs an issue is   
   unconscionably chintzy.   
      
   PART IV - ORDER SOUGHT   
      
   6. Appellant seeks an Order that the Respondent   
   A) defray the cost of the Appeal Book, and   
   B) serve a copy on all Appellants.   
      
   Dated at Toronto on April 15 2015.   
   For the Appellant:   
   John C. Turmel, B.Eng.,   
      
   JCT: Talk about a can of worms the Crown opened up by being   
   stingy with pauper patients. They might have gotten away with   
   producing one copy (big, everyone's stuff in it) and my having   
   to spread it around and instead, may now have to send everyone   
   a copy! Har har har. Hope so.   
      
   Couldn't hurt to ask. I can't afford it.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca